Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Pat: I just checked on the consultation, ad this is the correct wording/spelling
Question 8-1: ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to designate the band 64-71 GHz for licence-exempt operations on a no-protection, no-interference basis. Rich Kennedy Director, Global Spectrum Strategy Board Director, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group Chair Emeritus, IEEE 802.11af WLAN in TVWS Chair, Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory Task Group (737) 202-7014 From: Pat Thaler [mailto:pat.thaler@broadcom.com]
Question 8-1 should match the question asked so if it doesn't please correct. Licence/license appears to be British/American spelling convention. The dictionaries I checked don't show "licensce" as a valid alternative spelling. Licence
is what the Canadian government website uses so that shouldn't be changed. I'm okay with Roger's other corrections. I vote approve. Regards, Pat On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Kennedy, Rich <rich.kennedy@hpe.com> wrote:
|