Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++



John

Yes, but I expect 5C discussion to take up most of the time.

I expect that this can be handled in the Chair's guideline, but it depends what we write.

James Gilb

On 03/06/2013 01:48 PM, John D'Ambrosia wrote:
James,
Can we add an agenda item to the rules agenda on this?

Geoff - I could see some of this going into Chair's guidelines -
I personally think we should have the chair decide when a thread will go off reflector that a message thread be marked, and then the poor recording secretary who is such a great person knows which emails are related to that thread to be posted / recorded  onto the reflector.

It would also raise the question if the last single email that contains all of the threads could be used as a single entry?

Sigh....

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:41 PM
To: Roger Marks
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Geoff Thompson; Paul Nikolich
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++

Roger-
I agree with you for the need to have a crisp definition of a contingency situation.
My assumption is that it would take a ruling to that effect from the 802 Chair Geoff


On 63//13 12:55 PM, Roger Marks wrote:
I agree as well. Any such rule should address the issue of whether or not we are in a contingency situation. This may not always be clear.

Consider, for example, the current ballot. I have personally received 16 messages on the topic, 11 of which were copied to the reflector. The reflector archives include 11 messages on this topic (including 4 from Mike).

I would tentatively conclude, therefore, that each of these messages that was copied to the reflector was duly received and archived by the reflector. Therefore, I would surmise that we are not in a contingency situation. This is an indication that it's possible that there may be differences of view as to whether the contingency situation exists. Any rule should recognize this possibility.

Roger


On 2013/03/06, at 01:35 PM, Geoff Thompson wrote:


John-

On 63//13 12:08 PM, John_DAmbrosia@dell.com wrote:

I believe we should revisit our rules to deal with such situations with contingencies.

John


I agree.

Geoff

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.



----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.