Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++
Roger,
On the last email that I sent today
that included the reflector there wer error messages back to me on something like six EC members. How does one have any level of confidence that email is being received when that happens?
Something needs to be fixed.
Best regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Marks <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 14:55
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++
I agree as well. Any such rule should address the issue of whether or not we are in a contingency situation. This may not always be clear.
Consider, for example, the current ballot. I have personally received 16 messages on the topic, 11 of which were copied to the reflector. The reflector archives include 11 messages on this topic (including 4 from Mike).
I would tentatively conclude, therefore, that each of these messages that was copied to the reflector was duly received and archived by the reflector. Therefore, I would surmise that we are not in a contingency situation. This is an indication that it's possible that there may be differences of view as to whether the contingency situation exists. Any rule should recognize this possibility.
Roger
On 2013/03/06, at 01:35 PM, Geoff Thompson wrote:
> John-
>
> On 63//13 12:08 PM, John_DAmbrosia@dell.com wrote:
>> I believe we should revisit our rules to deal with such situations with contingencies.
>>
>> John
>>
>
> I agree.
>
> Geoff
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.