Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++
James,
Can we add an agenda item to the rules agenda on this?
Geoff - I could see some of this going into Chair's guidelines -
I personally think we should have the chair decide when a thread will go off reflector that a message thread be marked, and then the poor recording secretary who is such a great person knows which emails are related to that thread to be posted / recorded onto the reflector.
It would also raise the question if the last single email that contains all of the threads could be used as a single entry?
Sigh....
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:41 PM
To: Roger Marks
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Geoff Thompson; Paul Nikolich
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10 Day EC Ballot - Reply Comments to the FCC's Incentive Auction Proposal - Docket No. 12-268 +++
Roger-
I agree with you for the need to have a crisp definition of a contingency situation.
My assumption is that it would take a ruling to that effect from the 802 Chair Geoff
On 63//13 12:55 PM, Roger Marks wrote:
> I agree as well. Any such rule should address the issue of whether or not we are in a contingency situation. This may not always be clear.
>
> Consider, for example, the current ballot. I have personally received 16 messages on the topic, 11 of which were copied to the reflector. The reflector archives include 11 messages on this topic (including 4 from Mike).
>
> I would tentatively conclude, therefore, that each of these messages that was copied to the reflector was duly received and archived by the reflector. Therefore, I would surmise that we are not in a contingency situation. This is an indication that it's possible that there may be differences of view as to whether the contingency situation exists. Any rule should recognize this possibility.
>
> Roger
>
>
> On 2013/03/06, at 01:35 PM, Geoff Thompson wrote:
>
>
>> John-
>>
>> On 63//13 12:08 PM, John_DAmbrosia@dell.com wrote:
>>
>>> I believe we should revisit our rules to deal with such situations with contingencies.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Geoff
>>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.