Re: [802SEC] +++10 Day EC Email Ballot (Closes no later than 11 May 2007)+++Motion to approve Doc. 18-07-0026 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO [IMT.TECH]+++
All:
I am a bit concerned about the open ended nature of the motion. I paticipated in the referenced telecom and voted to approve. What I voted to approve was the document that had been discussed and agreed upon by the task group. I have no idea what the editorial and format changes will be. In fact It was recommended in the final tlecom that tables be deleted as an editorial change. this suggestion was objected to by the group. We do not know what other editorial changes may be made and if we all agree that they are editorial or substantive. I am ready to reaffirm my approval of the telom but not provide a blanket approval to as yet unidentified changes.
Arnie greenspan.
>
> From: "Michael Lynch" <mjlynch@NORTEL.COM>
> Date: 2007/05/01 Tue AM 07:29:13 EDT
> To: <stds-802-sec@IEEE.ORG>
> Subject: [802SEC] +++10 Day EC Email Ballot (Closes no later than 11 May 2007)+++Motion to approve Doc. 18-07-0026 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO [IMT.TECH]+++
>
> Dear EC members,
>
> During the March Plenary meeting it was decided that 802.18 would work
> by conference call to develop an input on IMT Advanced requirements for
> the May meeting of ITU-R WP8F. To that end there were six conference
> calls held. The EC was provided summaries of each of those calls.
>
> On 30 April 802.18 met by conference call to vote on the final document.
> The pool of eligible voters included the chairs of the participating
> WGs, and a quorum was present. A roll call vote was conducted and the
> document, 18-07-0026, was approved. The tally was 12/0/0.
>
> This document is not meant to be the only input from IEEE 802 regarding
> IMT Advanced. It may be that there will be additional inputs to ITU-R
> WP8F on this topic and others.
>
> This input proposes changes to an existing ITU-R WP8F document. The
> normal format for submitting a document such as this to ITU-R is with
> the changes tracked. We realized that this can make review of the
> document more complicated. What 802.18 has done is to provide the EC
> with two versions of Doc. 18-07-0026; one with change bars and one
> without. Both are available at http://ieee802.org/18/, in the March 2007
> meeting documents folder.
>
> As was agreed when this process was started there will be parallel
> ballots in the EC and in the WGs that participated. The 30 April meeting
> directed me to present 18-07-0026 to the EC for approval.
>
> Motion: Moved by Mike Lynch, seconded by Roger Marks
>
> To approve document 18-07-0026-00-0000 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO [IMT.TECH]
> as an 802 document, authorizing the chair of 802.18 to do necessary
> editorial and formatting changes and, using the document as a
> "template", create the appropriate input to ITU-R WP8F.
>
> Informative: This document provides ITU-R WP8F with the views of IEEE
> 802 on the topic of IMT Advanced requirements.
>
> This ballot opens at midnight CDT Tuesday 1 May and closes at midnight
> CDT Saturday 12 May 2007.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> +1 972 684 7518 (ESN 444 7518) Voice
> +1 972 684 3774 (ESN 444 3775) FAX
> +1 972 814 4901 (ESN 450 9401) Mobile
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.