Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector
Paul-
Where you say:
"- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'confidential
and proprietary'"
You should say:
"- any communication that has been explicitly deemed as possibly
'confidential and/or proprietary'"
...to match our policy regarding restrictive notices.
Geoff
In a message dated 7/26/2005 5:35:31 PM Central Standard Time,
>paul.nikolich@ATT.NET writes:
>Dear EC Members,
>
>Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to whether or not it
>is appropriate to put the attachment with high level contract terms in
>Buzz's motion on the reflector. I decided it was acceptable because the EC
>has had similar information from Buzz included in their minutes in the past.
>
>The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post onto the reflector
>remains, however. We don't have any crisp guidelines. I would like to hear
>from the EC members on what they think is an appropriate set of guidelines
>on this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.
>
>To get the list started, in my opinion the following information should be
>kept private:
>
>- final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the other hand, high
>level summary of terms and conditions are appropriate for posting)
>- any personal information (all reflector traffic should be strictly 802
>business related)
>- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'confidential and
>proprietary'
>- any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 'executive
>privilege'
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.