Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector
I agree with Paul's proposal and guidelines.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
In a message dated 7/26/2005 5:35:31 PM Central Standard Time,
paul.nikolich@ATT.NET writes:
Dear EC Members,
Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to whether or not it
is appropriate to put the attachment with high level contract terms in
Buzz's motion on the reflector. I decided it was acceptable because the EC
has had similar information from Buzz included in their minutes in the past.
The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post onto the reflector
remains, however. We don't have any crisp guidelines. I would like to hear
from the EC members on what they think is an appropriate set of guidelines
on this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.
To get the list started, in my opinion the following information should be
kept private:
- final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the other hand, high
level summary of terms and conditions are appropriate for posting)
- any personal information (all reflector traffic should be strictly 802
business related)
- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'confidential and
proprietary'
- any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 'executive
privilege'
Regards,
--Paul
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.