Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] P802-REVc Working Group ballot

WG chairs,

 

With this message I would like to announce that I have initiated a working group ballot on P802-REVc ending on March 7th.   The intent is to have comment resolution meetings at the March plenary.

 

The announcement is attached and in the 802.1 email archive: 

https://www.ieee802.org/1/private/email2/msg34985.html

 

As confirmed during the November plenary, the working group ballot is following this process:

 

  1. The ballot is initiated in the 802.1 WG under the Maintenance TG and anyone is entitled to submit comments
    https://1.ieee802.org/maintenance/802-revc/
  2. The draft is in the 802.1 private area on grouper and privileges are set such that all 802 WG passwords grant access
    https://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/802-REVc-drafts/d1/P802-REVc-d1-0.pdf
  3. Each WG chair is requested to conduct a comment collection using your WG process (for at least 30 days). The WG chair is not expected to change the commenter's name, review the comments collected or have WG consensus
  4. Each WG chair is an ex-officio voting member and is requested to cast a ballot with the collected comments. The WG chair decides how they determine the vote on this ballot
  5. Ballot comment disposition may include an informational summary of comments/votes per WG
  6. The 802.1 ballot is 40 days to give WG chairs sufficient time
  7. Each WG chair is requested to identify a representative to represent the submitted comments from that WG and/or the WG view dduring comment resolution.  
  8. Comment resolution will be conducted in dedicated meetings under the 802.1 Maintenance TG. Meeting announcements and discussion will happen on the Architecture list -- STDS-802-ARCH
    http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-ARCH&A=1

 

As a result I would ask the WG chairs to initiate comment collection on this draft in your WGs.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Cheers,

Glenn.

--

Glenn Parsons

Chair, IEEE 802.1 WG

glenn.parsons@ericsson.com

+1-514-379-9037

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1

--- Begin Message --- 
Ballot due Jan. 27: P802.1ASdn/D1.0
For particulars see
  https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-9b1717ea20afc093&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2F1.ieee802.org%2Factive-ballots%2F
Working Group 802.1 Web pages: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-ed53a332b5681f27&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2F1.ieee802.org%2F
802.1 list help: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-cf8008d3fe9b799f&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2F1.ieee802.org%2Femail-lists%2F
-----

NOTE: ALL BALLOT RESPONSES MUST BE SENT TO THE BALLOT RESPONSE LIST:
        mailto:STDS-802-1-ballot@listserv.ieee.org

This Email is attached to an official 802.1 Working Group ballot form for P802-REVc/D1.0 - Draft Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Overview and Architecture. As this is a full Working Group ballot, only 802.1 voting members and ex-officio members are entitled to vote. Each IEEE 802 WG chair (as an ex-officio 802.1 voting member) is requested to collect and submit ballot comments on P802-REVc/D1.0 for their WG during this Working Group ballot. This process is recommended so that the WG chair vote can be recorded with the comments. The WG chair is not expected to change the commenter's name, review the comments collected or have WG consensus. The WG chair decides how they determine the vote on this ballot. However, any non-voting participants in the activities of 802.1 may submit a "Comments Only" ballot on the draft. In accordance with established practice in 802 and the IEEE, all comments received, whether from voters or non-voters, are given due consideration during the Ballot resolution process.

As this is a formal WG ballot, if you vote "Approve" you are stating that, in your professional opinion, you consider the document to be technically complete, and ready for Sponsor ballot. Hence, sending in an "Approve" ballot response within a small number of minutes of the ballot start time cannot possibly mean that the voter has given the document the level of professional consideration necessary to make such a judgment.

The 802.1 voting members that are entitled to a vote on this ballot are as follows (NOTE: for a WG ballot, the voting population is fixed at the start of the ballot, and does not change during any subsequent recirculation ballots, regardless of any membership changes over the course of the balloting cycle):

Akizuki, Katsuyuki
Arunarthi, Venkat
Assmann, Ralf
Bao, Huajie
Belliardi, Rudy
Blendin, Jeremias
Boiger, Christian
Bottorff, Paul
Canchi, Radhakrishna
Chen, Feng
Choudhury, Abhijit
Congdon, Paul
Cummings, Rodney
Dorr, Josef
Elbakoury, Hesham
Engelmann, Anna
Enzinger, Thomas
Farkas, Janos
Fedyk, Donald
Finn, Norman
Garner, Geoffrey
Gopal, Amrit
Gunther, Craig
Gutierrez, Marina
Haddock, Stephen
Hantel, Mark
Holness, Marc
Hopf, Daniel
Huh, Woojung
Itaya, Satoko
Ito, Yoshihiro
Karl, Michael
Kehrer, Stephan
Kiessling, Marcel
Lai, Gavin
Lopes, Joao
Lv, Lily
Mangin, Christophe
Mansfield, Scott
Mater, Olaf
McCall, David
McMillan, Larry
Nakano, Hiroki
Pannell, Donald R
Parsons, Glenn
Proell, Dieter
Randall, Karen
Riegel, Maximilian
Rodrigues, Silvana
Rouyer, Jessy
Sato, Atsushi
Schewe, Frank
Seaman, Michael
Seewald, Maik
Sivakolundu, Ramesh
Specht, Johannes
Stamenic, Nemanja
Stanica, Marius
Steindl, Guenter
Traore, Karim
Turner, Max
Varga, Balazs
Venkatesan, Ganesh
Wang, Tongtong
Weber, Karl
Wessels, Leon
Winkel, Ludwig
Woods, Jordon
Yamaura, Takahiro
Zeier, Uwe
Zein, Nader
Zhao, William
Zinner, Helge

It should be noted that the ongoing retention of 802.1 voting rights is predicated on active participation in Working Group ballots. Active participation is defined to be returning ballot responses in two out of the last three Working Group ballot series.  A ballot series includes the initial WG ballot and any subsequent recirculation ballots. The 802 WG Rules allow abstention for any cause other than "lack of technical expertise" to be treated as though it were a failure to respond to a ballot.

The closing date of this ballot is:

         7 March 2023

The PDF file of P802-REVc/D1.0 can be found at:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-20715969e52553f0&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd1%2FP802-REVc-d1-0.pdf

Comments should be made against the version of the draft above. There is also a  comparison draft with changes notes at:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-04cdee4c8a5505c0&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd1%2FP802-REVc-d1-0-compare.pdf

The comment disposition for the previous ballot is here:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-627eeeedffdb1b3d&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd0%2F802-REVc-d0-2-comments-03.pdf

If you have any difficulty downloading or reading this file, let me know.

As is normal with such ballots, comments should specify not only what problems have been identified with the text, but also what the commenter proposes as a solution.

Any comments accompanying the ballot must be presented using either of the templates to be found here:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-d8ab7ba968758012&q=1&e=81a90f11-f051-4138-bf4f-c25195122a66&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2Fcommenting-tool%2FMyBallot-tools%2F

Please ensure that you are using one of the latest templates referenced by the link above, not a template from a prior ballot, and have completed the Affiliation entry.

Comments can be generated using Excel or an equivalent spreadsheet program that will read XLS or CSV format files. Attach the resultant file, in XLS or CSV format, to your ballot response email. The editor would appreciate the attached comment file clearly identify the commenter's name, project and draft number. The following file name format is suggested:

     p802-revc-d1-0-comments-<yourname>.xls



RETURNING YOUR BALLOT FORM
==========================
Your ballot must be returned to:
mailto:STDS-802-1-ballot@listserv.ieee.org

You are requested to use (exactly!) the appropriate Subject line from the following set when returning your ballot email. Please send your ballot with the Subject line explicitly set, rather than using the Reply function in your mailer.

P802-REVc/D1.0 - Approve
P802-REVc/D1.0 - Comments (with approve)
P802-REVc/D1.0 - Disapprove
P802-REVc/D1.0 - Comments (with abstain)
P802-REVc/D1.0 - Abstain
P802-REVc/D1.0 - Comments only

Your ballot must include the ballot form in the body and optionally an attachment with comments.

Regards,
Glenn Parsons
Chair, IEEE 802.1 Working Group.

******************************
Ballot form follows.....
******************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: EMAIL ALL BALLOT RESPONSES ONLY TO:
mailto:STDS-802-1-ballot@listserv.ieee.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
==========================
P802-REVc/D1.0 EMAIL BALLOT
==========================
TO: James Gilb, Editor, P802-REVc
SUBJECT:        P802-REVc/D1.0 - Draft Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Overview and Architecture

_____ I Approve (may attach non-binding comments below)
_____ I Disapprove (must attach binding comments below)
_____ I Abstain for the following reasons (may attach non-binding comments below):
_____ Lack of Time
_____ Lack of Expertise
_____ Other: _______________________________

____________________________________________
(Name)
____________________________________________
(Affiliation)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

INCLUDE COMMENTS ONLY AS AN ATTACHMENT, USING THE TEMPLATES IDENTIFIED
ABOVE. IF THERE IS NO AFFILIATION IN THE TEMPLATE, IT IS THE WRONG ONE!

===
Unsubscribe link: mailto:STDS-802-1-L-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
IEEE. Fostering technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity.

--- End Message ---