| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
G’day all Whatever we do, we should ensure that the representation is unambiguous (preferably by aligning with an International Standard, like ISO 8601) Despite an apparent motion by the EC, any use of
mm/dd/yyyy is ambiguous and confusing in most of the world. AoE is also slightly ambiguous because it does not account for DLS, although it is good enough in practice Andrew From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
On Behalf Of Geoff Thompson George- How did this happen? I am under the impression that the EC passed a motion some years ago that all 802 actions (as opposed to IEEE actions) that have a calendar closing date of the format mm/dd/yyyy
AOE. I believe we should honor all registrations in that 12 hour period at the lower rate. It is precisely because of this sort of confusion and inconvenience with quoting calendar closing dates that we adopted AoE. Best regards, Geoff Thompson On Wednesday, February 23, 2022, 08:35:30 AM PST, George Zimmerman <george@cmephyconsulting.com> wrote:
All – just a reminder, per the plenary announcement (http://802world.org/plenary/) the meeting
fee increases Friday at 11:59PM UTC, not AoE. I was just on a call where a number of individuals thought it was AoE, so you may wish to remind your groups not to wait until the last minute. Additionally, I can report we currently have almost 850 registrants for the March meeting, and climbing. George Zimmerman, Ph.D. 802 LMSC Treasurer To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |