Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] 802 straw poll

1) Yes
2) 3
3a) I would prefer to start with a small number of licenses and expand with demand (depending on how the cost per license varies).
3b) If possible, I think that a license should be assigned to a WG, which could work out schedule to rotate its use among the WGs editors. If the license credentials were generic to the WG, then perhaps the rotation could take place without management by the central administrator.

Cheers,

Roger
On Aug 7, 2020, 3:55 PM -0600, James P. K. Gilb <000008e8b69871c2-dmarc-request@listserv.ieee.org>, wrote:
All

All voting members, please respond to this straw poll. Others are, of
course, allowed to express their opinion as well. I will be bugging all
the voting members to respond.

Questions:
1) Do you support a 1 year trial of the IEEE 802 LMSC paying for
Framemaker license rental for Technical Editors who would not otherwise
receive funding from their employer or affiliation.

Yes/No:

2) If the IEEE 802 LMSC decides to do this, how many licenses should be
purchased?

Enter an positive integer:

3) Please feel free to provide other comments:

Free form text field here:

Thanks

James Gilb

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1