Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] PAR Review Rebuttal comments to 802.15.9ma and 802.15.22.13



Jon

I missed the meeting, but concur with your point on considered vs. defined.

James Gilb

On 7/18/19 3:12 AM, Jon Rosdahl wrote:
Hi Bob,
   Thanks for responding to the 802.11 comments.  We have some more items
for consideration that we would like the group to consider prior to
proceeding.

802.15.9ma ??? Disagree with the use of ???considered??? and believe ???defined??? is
the appropriate word to use in a scope of a standard.
      The Standard does not "consider" things.  A Project may consider
things during the course of the project, but the fine Standard will be
defining or not the KMPs.


802.15.22.3 ??? Changes for the explanation are not clear if it is a
replacement or an addition.
       In looking at the PDF file, it is not clear if the edit to the
explanation is a replacement or an addition.  It is unfortunate that a new
file was not created. with the corrections made. (either edit the PDF, or
create a word version with the corrections that will need to be sent to the
NesCom Administrator).

Kind Regards,
Jon
802.11 PAR Review Chair



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl                 Engineer, Senior Staff
office: 801-492-4023      Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
cell:   801-376-6435      10871 North 5750 West
                                    Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.