Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Colleagues, Rebuttal comments on the PAR for P802.1AErev were received from 802.11. While we are not aware of a rule describing the process for rebuttal comments, 802.1 WG has prepared additional responses to the comments in this document: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/admin-farkas-11-rebuttal-responses-0717-v2.pdf The PAR remains unchanged: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/ae-seaman-rev-draft-par0717-v04.pdf
Cheers, Glenn. From: Jon Rosdahl [mailto:jrosdahl@ieee.org] Greetings, The 802.11 PAR Review SC has the following rebuttal for the comment responses: 1.PAR 6.1.b. Explanation: “RAC review of previously reviewed text is appropriate to assure terminology and descriptions of usage
are correct.”
Suggested replacement: “RAC should review the use of registry terms that appear in the document.”
Respectfully submitted,
Jon
802.11 PAR Review SC Chair
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Glenn Parsons <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com> wrote:
|