| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Colleagues, Rebuttal comments on the PAR for P802.1Qcx - Amendment: YANG Data Model for Connectivity Fault Management were received from 802.11. While we are not aware of a rule describing the process for rebuttal comments, 802.1 WG has prepared additional responses to the comments in this document: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/admin-farkas-11-rebuttal-responses-0717-v2.pdf
The PAR has been updated: http://ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/cx-draft-PAR-0517-v03.pdf
The CSD is unchanged: http://ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/cx-draft-CSD-0517-v02.pdf Cheers, Glenn. From: Jon Rosdahl [mailto:jrosdahl@ieee.org] The 802.11 PAR Review SC has the following rebuttal/follow-up comments for 802.1Qcx:
1. PAR 5.3
– “If yes, please explain” – listing the title of another amendment does not seem to “explain”.
•How is the proposed standard dependent on IEEE
P802.1Q-Rev and IEEE P802.1Qcp? •What is the schedule impact due to the dependency
on IEEE P802.1Q-Rev and IEEE P802.1Qcp?
2. PAR – 6.1b – “The YANG Data Model will be assigned a URN based on the RA URN tutorial
and IEEE Std 802d.” a)The acronyms need to be expanded “URN”, “RA” b)The RA URN tutorial should include a reference. c)IEEE Std 802d should be fully cited in 8.1 Respectfully submitted: Jon 802.11 PAR Review SC Chair
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Glenn Parsons <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com> wrote:
|