| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Colleagues, Rebuttal comments on the PAR for P802.1CBcv - Amendment: Information Model, YANG Data Model and Management Information Base Module were received from 802.11. While we are not aware of a rule describing the process for rebuttal comments, 802.1 WG has prepared additional responses to the comments in this document: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2017/admin-farkas-11-rebuttal-responses-0717-v2.pdf The WG has considered theses rebuttals and has decided to defer progression of the P802.1CBcv PAR until a future meeting to allow further development of the PAR and CSD. Cheers, Glenn. From: Jon Rosdahl [mailto:jrosdahl@ieee.org] Greetings, The 802.11 PAR Review SC has the following Rebuttal comments for consideration:
5 – PAR 6.1b – The citing of IEEE 802d requires that the full standard be listed in 8.1, as well as IEEE std. 802. Also “RA” , “OID” and “URN” acronyms need to be spelled out
on first usage as well.
6 – CSD 1.2.5 – In the beginning of the CSD, there is discussion of MIB and YANG models, but in the new text in 1.2.5, there seems to be a change to YANG and SNMP (transport of
the MIB), should this section be referring to the impact of the MIB. If Not, then you should also include a reference for SNMP. Respectfully Submitted, Jon 802.11 PAR Review SC Chair -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Glenn Parsons <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com> wrote:
|