Adrian,
As I understand, you are discussing membership retention and loss based
only on participation. In other words, your question presumes that the
individual has met all other obligations (balloting, fees, ...). I'll
share my views based on that understanding.
Subclause 7.2.1 states the conditions for establishing membership. An
individual who meets those conditions has a right to be granted
membership. The rules do not provide for WG officials to override the
individual's membership rights; for example, by declaring that some
session participation will be ignored on the grounds that the individual
has recently lost membership.
I don't see any ambiguity on this in the rules.
Regards,
Roger
Stephens, Adrian P <mailto:Adrian.P.Stephens@INTEL.COM>
21 February 2014 12:34 AM
Dear SEC,
If you are responsible for maintaining voting status for your WG,
please respond to the
question at the end of this email.
A query by an 802.11 member causes me to question how I've interpreted
the WG P&P regarding
loss of membership through non-attendance.
The WG P&P State: (my highlight)
7.2.2. Retention
Membership is retained by participating in at least two of the last
four plenary sessions. One duly
constituted interim WG or task group session may be substituted for
one of the two plenary
sessions.
7.2.3. Loss
Excepting recirculation letter ballots membership may be lost if two
of the last three WG letter
ballots are not returned, or are returned with an abstention for other
than "lack of technical
expertise." This rule may be excused by the WG Chair if the individual
is otherwise an active
participant. If lost per this subclause, membership is re-established
as if the person were a new
candidate member.
It describes how to retain membership by participation, but does not
state what happens
if the member fails to maintain membership. In the case of failure
to return ballots, it is
explicit that the member is reset as though a new member.
So, the rules are ambiguous. You could interpolate a rule similar
to the highlighted case
for non-attendance (which I have unconsciously done in 802.11). In
doing so, I am following
previous 802.11 vice chairs' interpretation.
We have a member with the following attendances
03 2013 - No (plenary)
05 2013 - No (interim)
07 2013 - Yes (plenary)
09 2013 - No (interim)
11 2013 - No (plenary) (loses voting rights)
01 2013 - Yes (interim)
03 2013 - Yes (plenary)
According to the "everything reset" interpretation, the member is an
aspirant at the
start of march. According to the "2 in last 4 plenaries, regardless
of loss of voting rights in this period"
interpretation, he is a potential voter.
The implication of the "does not reset" interpretation is that a
member never transitions to non-member
directly, but always transitions first to aspirant. And then later
transitions to non-member.
IMHO, your working groups must be operating one of the following two
rules:
1.Resets to non-member, loses previous attendances
2.Reverts to aspirant, keeps previous attendances for future gain to
voting member.
Please let me know of these rule you are operating. If it turns out
we're all doing the same thing, we should
put that in the WG P&P.
Best Regards,
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900 (mobile, UK)
Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)
----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.