Re: [802SEC] Comments received on the OmniRAN draft PAR proposal
Hi Michael,
Hopefully I was able to show in the response to Subir's email that no
comments were ignored in the process, with formal care taken not to set an
example of opening a backdoor to the established IEEE 802 rules.
While I highly appreciate and take into account all the effort of the
participants to make the outcome better, I did not like to set the precedent
for similar cases in future.
Hopefully we will not start a discussion in the EC closing whether an EC SG
chair has to ignore the procedural rules of IEEE 802.
Bye
Max
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of ext Michael Lynch
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 06:54
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Comments received on the OmniRAN draft PAR proposal
Subir,
I'm going to keep it brief and simply say that I agree with your comments.
The last time that I checked IEEE 802 is an international organization and
coordinating and/or getting them agreed can take additional time.
It sounds as if we will have an interesting EC meeting tomorrow.
Best regards,
Mike
Sent from my Samsung IntrepidT on the Now Network from SprintR.
-----Original Message-----
From: Das, Subir <sdas@APPCOMSCI.COM>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 23:29
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Comments received on the OmniRAN draft PAR proposal
Hello Max,
I am wondering why ECSG has decided not to address Charlie's comments. I
understand that Charlie submitted the comments after Tuesday 5 pm deadline
but if the purpose of a PAR/5C is to be reviewed by other groups and
members, then these comments should have been addressed. You asked James and
my understanding is that his comment was "The rules don't require OmniRAN to
address them. However, they will probably come up in the Friday closing if
you don't, so the best policy would be to address them." OTH, ECSG
completely ignored it.
Regards,
_Subir
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On
Behalf Of Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:07 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; jpgilb@gmail.com
Cc: 'ext Charles E. Perkins'
Subject: [802SEC] Comments received on the OmniRAN draft PAR proposal
To make sure that we are not missing any comments to the OmniRAN draft PAR
proposal I would like to confirm the receipt of the comments.
In my email, I received comments from the following groups/individuals:
- Pat Thaler (individual on Oct 17th)
- James Gilb
- IEEE 802.1
- IEEE 802.11
- IEEE 802.19
The comments are collected in
https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/13/omniran-13-0091-00-ecsg-nov-2013-coll
ected-comments-on-draft-par-proposal.xlsx for processing by the OmniRAN EC
SG.
Please send me a notice, if comments were submitted and the submitter is not
mentioned above.
Furthermore I received comments by private email from Charles Perkins at
Tue, 11:15 PM, more than 6 hours after the submission deadline. The comments
received after submission deadline will not be addressed by the EC SG.
James, please advise if the EC SG should address the late PAR comments
submission.
Bye
Max
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.