Re: [802SEC] 802 November workshop - 16 Nov 2013

[Tony Jeffree <tony@JEFFREE.CO.UK>]

John -

All that is needed is to change the penultimate item (that currently says "How does latest understanding of OMNIRAN...") to "Cooperation and contributions of the other WGs in the 802.1-OmniRAN project", as I suggested, and leave your item alone.

Regards,
Tony

On 5 September 2013 13:03, John D'Ambrosia <John_DAmbrosia@dell.com> wrote:

Max / Tony,

Then I suggest we add a second item.

 

I personally believe we should discuss how to enable getting groups working together closer or at least being better informed of each other’s efforts.

 

We did away with the 802 opening plenary.  Perhaps we should consider adding a tutorial once a year where we get all of the WG’s to give updates?  From my own personal experience, I am reaching out to 802.11 for input, as well as been asked to go and talk with other groups regarding the industry connections vehicle.

 

John

From: Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:maximilian.riegel@nsn.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 7:52 PM
To: DAmbrosia, John; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [802SEC] 802 November workshop - 16 Nov 2013

 

I am not really happy with the title of the OmniRAN related topic, as mentioned below and would like to second Tony's proposal. I came up with the refined title to talk about cooperation with other WGs specific in the scope of the OmniRAN PAR. I do not see much correlation with the 400G Study Group, but John might be able to explain, why both cases would fit/complement each other.

 

Bye

Max

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of ext John D'Ambrosia
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:09
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802 November workshop - 16 Nov 2013

 

Tony,

I would like to suggest leaving the agenda item on co-operation between WGs as is, and using OmniRAN as a case study, as well as the 400G Study Group as another case study.  I am happy to share the time with Max.

 

John

 

From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:02 PM
To: Stephens, Adrian P
Cc: 802-exec
Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802 November workshop - 16 Nov 2013

 

Hi Adrian

 

A few points:

 

"Definitions of Mesh and Bridging" sounds to me like a technical topic, and as such, is not an appropriate topic for an EC offsite. Please remove this from the agenda.

 

I believe that where we ended up in our offline discussion regarding OmniRAN was Max's suggestion that the topic should be "Cooperation and contributions of the other WGs in the 802.1-OmniRAN project". Please change that agenda item accordingly.

 

I would like to add 2 topics to the agenda:

 

- Adherence to "Procedure for PARs"

 

- Term limits for Sponsor officers

 

Regards,
Tony

 

On 28 August 2013 11:18, Stephens, Adrian P <Adrian.P.Stephens@intel.com> wrote:

Dear 802.11EC,

 

The agenda items collected so far for the EC workshop are as follows:

Description	Presenter	Duration	Priority	Status
Review Goals, Objectives and Constraints for Workshop	Adrian	5m	1
Review actions from previous meeting	Adrian	30m	1
How much background info in a PAR		30m	2	Looking for an owner for this topic
Definitions of mesh and bridging		30m	3
Next Gen publishing system	Kim Breitfelder or Walter Pienciak	30m	2	Agreed
802 Marketing for 2014	D'Ambrosia/McCabe	30m		John asked for this
IEEE-SA service levels	Jon / Pat	20m	2	Jon or Pat has agreed to this
IEEE-SA service levels for starting ballots (i.e. introduced delays) (Might be part of a general SA tools discussion)	Adrian	10m	2	Include in general tools discussion
Non-USA meetings services requirements Take feedback on Geneva meeting and identify any issues Review existing requirements and discuss if they are adequate	Pat / Jon	45m		Jon or Pat has agreed to this
How does latest understanding of OMNIRAN fit into 802 architecture? What is the opportunity/impact on WGs?	Max Riegel	30m		Can only hold this item if 802.1 has come to agreement on architectural fit.
Technical interchange between WGs We have tutorials.  But should there be a way of encouraging increased technical interchange between each others' groups.	TBD	15m		looking for a volunteer
Review Actions from this meeting	Secretary TBC	15m

 

There is room for a couple of additional substantial topics for discussion.   If you have an idea for an agenda

item,  or wish to volunteer,  please let me know asap.

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Adrian P STEPHENS

 

Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900 (mobile,  UK)

Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)

 

----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.