Re: [802SEC] Clause 13 Report: Conditional Approval for RevCom, P802.16p and P802.16.1b
James,
Yes, both recircs received one comment. Even though Clause 13 doesn't specify that I report the detail, I'm happy to provide it to you: both comments were "Editorial Coordination" comments that said "This draft meets all editorial requirements."
Roger
On 2012/08/02, at 01:30 PM, James P. K. Gilb wrote:
> Roger
>
> You said that "No comments were submitted by ballot group members in the third recirc."
>
> Were any comments submitted, regardless of the source?
>
> James Gilb
>
> On 08/01/2012 10:09 PM, Roger Marks wrote:
>> to: 802 EC reflector
>> cc: 802.16 reflector
>>
>> Dear EC Colleagues:
>>
>> I am writing to report on the status of P802.16p and P802.16.1b, per the Clause 13 Conditional Approvals (to RevCom) granted on 20 July.
>>
>> The conditions have been met.
>>
>> The following sequence of events applies to both P802.16p and P802.16.1b:
>>
>> *The third recirc ran from 17 July - 1 August
>> *No Disapprove votes were submitted in the third recirc.
>> *No comments were submitted by ballot group members in the third recirc.
>> *No changes result from the third recirc.
>> *The approval ratio is 98%, with two Disapprove votes.
>>
>> Both drafts are on the RevCom agenda for 29 August.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> Roger B. Marks <roger@consensii.com>
>> Consensii LLC <http://consensii.com>
>> Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access <http://WirelessMAN.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.