Re: [802SEC] Clause 13 Report: Conditional Approval for RevCom, P802.16p and P802.16.1b

["James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>]

Roger

You said that "No comments were submitted by ballot group members in the 
third recirc."

Were any comments submitted, regardless of the source?

James Gilb

On 08/01/2012 10:09 PM, Roger Marks wrote:
> to: 802 EC reflector
> cc: 802.16 reflector
>
> Dear EC Colleagues:
>
> I am writing to report on the status of P802.16p and P802.16.1b, per the Clause 13 Conditional Approvals (to RevCom) granted on 20 July.
>
> The conditions have been met.
>
> The following sequence of events applies to both P802.16p and P802.16.1b:
>
> *The third recirc ran from 17 July - 1 August
> *No Disapprove votes were submitted in the third recirc.
> *No comments were submitted by ballot group members in the third recirc.
> *No changes result from the third recirc.
> *The approval ratio is 98%, with two Disapprove votes.
>
> Both drafts are on the RevCom agenda for 29 August.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger
>
> Roger B. Marks <roger@consensii.com>
> Consensii LLC <http://consensii.com>
> Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access <http://WirelessMAN.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.