Re: [802SEC] Sponsor ballot authorization for P802.1Qaz
Colleauges -
Results to date are as follows:
Vote categories: APP DIS ABS DNV
--------------------------------------------------
1) VC Pat Thaler APP
2) VC Mat Sherman APP
3) TR John Hawkins DNV
4) RS James Gilb APP
5) ES Jon Rosdahl DNV
6) 01 Tony Jeffree APP
7) 03 David Law APP
8) 11 Bruce Kraemer APP
9) 15 Bob Heile APP
0) 16 Roger Marks DNV
1) 17 John Lemon DNV
2) 18 Mike Lynch APP
3) 19 Steve Shellhammer APP
4) 20 Mark Klerer APP
5) 21 Subir Das APP
6) 22 Apurva Mody APP
7) 23 Geoff Thompson APP
8) ME Buzz Rigsbee non-voting
9) CH Paul Nikolich non-voting
---------------------------------------------------
17 TOTALS result 13 00 00 4
As the Approve count is now well over 50%, it is clear that this motion has
received "...sufficient responses ...to clearly decide the matter", so this
ballot has now closed and the motion has passed.
Many thanks to all for the rapid responses.
Regards,
Tony
On 21 September 2010 16:28, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
> I notice that I didn't formulate the early close condition quite right...
>
> "Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of
> the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual,
> this is notice that, to ensure the Sponsor ballot is started in a timely
> manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received
> to clearly decide the matter."
>
> So, the ballot opens 21st September and will close on the 3rd October, or
> once sufficient responses are received to show a majority for or against,
> whichever is sooner.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
>
> On 21 September 2010 15:35, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> All -
>>
>> Paul has authorized me to run an email ballot on the following motion:
>>
>> "EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
>>
>> Moved:Jeffree
>> Second: Thaler"
>>
>> Closing date for the ballot will be Sunday 3rd October, or the date that
>> all voting members of the EC have responded, whichever is earlier.
>>
>> I approve the motion.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 September 2010 13:33, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paul -
>>>
>>> We have a pretty clean result for the latest P802.1Qaz recirculation and
>>> I would like to run an EC email ballot on a motion to allow it to be
>>> forwarded to Sponsor ballot. Pat will second. The recirc results are:
>>>
>>> We had no new disapprove votes and no changes to the document from the
>>> recirculation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Approve: 27
>>>
>>> Disapprove: 1
>>>
>>> Approve %: 96%
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Abstain: 32
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Responding: 60
>>>
>>> Voters: 96
>>>
>>> Response %: 62%
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The disapprove voter is Anoop Ghanwani who has indicated that he is
>>> satisfied with the resolution of all but one of his comments. The comment
>>> on which he is maintaining his disapprove vote is:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Cl **38 **SC **38.5.4 **P **64 **L
>>> # *99
>>>
>>> *Comment Type **TR*
>>>
>>> This clause needs to have an associated PFC Defense mechanism. The need
>>> for this is
>>>
>>> covered in: az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf.
>>>
>>> *SuggestedRemedy*
>>>
>>> Add a defense mechanism for PFC. The mechanism would be similar to that
>>> specified for
>>>
>>> CN.
>>>
>>> REJECT. Group consensus has been that this is not a solution that DCB
>>> wishes to persue.
>>>
>>> This has not changed from pervious ballots.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The file mentioned in the comment is available at:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2009/az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> The motion would be:
>>>
>>> "EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
>>>
>>> Moved:Jeffree
>>>
>>> Second: Thaler"
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tony
>>>
>>
>>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.