Re: [802SEC] Sponsor ballot authorization for P802.1Qaz
All -
Paul has authorized me to run an email ballot on the following motion:
"EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
Moved:Jeffree
Second: Thaler"
Closing date for the ballot will be Sunday 3rd October, or the date that all
voting members of the EC have responded, whichever is earlier.
I approve the motion.
Regards,
Tony
On 21 September 2010 13:33, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Paul -
>
> We have a pretty clean result for the latest P802.1Qaz recirculation and I
> would like to run an EC email ballot on a motion to allow it to be forwarded
> to Sponsor ballot. Pat will second. The recirc results are:
>
> We had no new disapprove votes and no changes to the document from the
> recirculation.
>
>
>
> Approve: 27
>
> Disapprove: 1
>
> Approve %: 96%
>
>
>
> Abstain: 32
>
>
>
> Responding: 60
>
> Voters: 96
>
> Response %: 62%
>
>
>
> The disapprove voter is Anoop Ghanwani who has indicated that he is
> satisfied with the resolution of all but one of his comments. The comment
> on which he is maintaining his disapprove vote is:
>
>
>
> *Cl **38 **SC **38.5.4 **P **64 **L
> # *99
>
> *Comment Type **TR*
>
> This clause needs to have an associated PFC Defense mechanism. The need for
> this is
>
> covered in: az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf.
>
> *SuggestedRemedy*
>
> Add a defense mechanism for PFC. The mechanism would be similar to that
> specified for
>
> CN.
>
> REJECT. Group consensus has been that this is not a solution that DCB
> wishes to persue.
>
> This has not changed from pervious ballots.
>
>
>
> The file mentioned in the comment is available at:
>
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2009/az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf
>
>
> The motion would be:
>
> "EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
>
> Moved:Jeffree
>
> Second: Thaler"
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.