Re: [802SEC] trial-run interim EC telecon meetings--1-3pm ET 11JUN2010?
Hey Roger, The message says October 1, which is a Friday. Check again.
:-)
Thanx, Buzz
Please note my contact info:
Dr. Everett O (Buzz) Rigsbee
IEEE-802 LMSC Meeting Manager
7750 80th Place SE
Mercer Island, WA 98040-5912
ph/fx: 206-236-2229
cell: 206-818-4978
SkypeID: BRigsB
BRigsB@ieee.org
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On
Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:10 PM
To: Paul Nikolich
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] trial-run interim EC telecon meetings--1-3pm ET
11JUN2010?
Paul,
I will probably not be available for 11 June - the meeting is scheduled to
begin at midnight where I will be (in Vietnam).
I can't commit to 10 October either - it's a Sunday and I may need to be
flying that day.
Roger
On 2010/04/26, at 06:02 PM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> Geoff, All,
>
> I thing the best thing for us to do is to have a 'trial' EC teleconference
1-3pm ET 11June as a means of shaking down the process. We can report the
results of the trial-run to the members in July, refine the process, and
(perhaps) have the 1st 'official' interim EC teleconference the 1st week of
October.
>
> I'm pretty sure I can get web/teleconference services from the IEEE that
will provide adequate ports. I think 30 days advance notice of this
'trial-run' interim EC meeting should be sufficient.
>
> Tentative agenda--I will take requests for additional agenda items--but I
think it would be useful to cover the following:
>
> 0) Engage in debate regarding an effective way to implement a regular
"interm EC teleconference" in OCT, FEB and JUN. -- 30 minutes
> 1) 802 WG/TAG updates--any items coming out of the WG/TAG interim sessions
the EC should be aware of? now is the time to bring them up -- 30 minutes
> 2) 802 Overview and Architecture revision project status update -- 15
minutes
> 3) IEEE SA items--the SASB meetings start 15JUN--status update on the
Amazon single-copy sales channel project --5 minutes
> 4) IEEE SA BoG update -- report from May BoG meeting--10 minutes
> 5) spare time for other topics -- 30 minutes
>
> The toughest thing to do will be to find a time when all EC members are
available. I've suggested the time/date of 1-3pm ET 11JUN2010--all EC
members please keep that timeslot open and confirm you are available. While
your are at it--please reserve time for 1-3pm ET 01OCT2010 and 1-3pm ET
04FEB2011...
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Thompson" <thompson@ieee.org>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC
telecon meetings
>
>
>> Paul-
>> In my view, this proposal helps substantially except that we need to be
careful on the open meeting aspect.
>> That means that the conference calls would require:
>> - sufficient advance notice of the conference call
>> - sufficient distribution of the advance notice
>> - sufficient conference ports available for observers
>> And, since this would be a significant change in process (even if not in
rules) then I don't think we should do it until after the next Plenary so
that we can adjust the expectations of our constituency at that time.
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>> On 4/26/10 11:10 AM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> That is a very interesting suggestion--it gives us time to hash things
out in real time and then make a quick decision in non-real, rule-compliant
time...hmmm.
>>>
>>> --Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shellhammer, Steve"
<sshellha@QUALCOMM.COM>
>>> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim
EC telecon meetings
>>>
>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>> One way to deal with this is to hold a non-voting meeting where we
discuss motions and then to have a post-meeting electronic ballot, on each
motion. So the discussion could take place during the call. We could even
have a straw poll and it there is controversy discuss what the controversy
is.
>>>>
>>>> The main issue is the overhead of having the electronic ballot. Maybe
a simple spreadsheet could be used to combine all the motions onto a single
spreadsheet and people could just enter their votes. It is more overhead
but it would be helpful to the WGs on motions to go to Sponsor ballot and
RevCom. We might end up with less conditional motions to go to Sponsor
ballot and RevCom since WGs would not have to wait 4 months.
>>>>
>>>> I believe this works with the current rules.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:34 AM
>>>> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim
EC telecon meetings
>>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>> I don't think 2 quite covers the response I gave. My points were
>>>> -- we already have continuous processing available via email votes
except for submittal of PARs to NesCom.
>>>> PARs to NesCom should continue to be an action taken only at plenaries
>>>> (except perhaps for corrigenda)
>>>> email is best for continuous processing of approval to go to sponsor
ballot or RevCom
>>>> -- therefore, I don't support having an interim EC meeting for these,
but I could see one to deal with the topics and coordination that get short
shrift during a busy plenary
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pat
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:04 PM
>>>> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>> Subject: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC
telecon meetings
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> So far the responses generally fall into two categories:
>>>>
>>>> 1) good idea, need to work out details, go for it
>>>> (Apurva, Buzz, Steve, Bruce, Jon, JohnH, Subir, Mike)
>>>>
>>>> 2) not a bad idea, have concerns, proceed with caution
>>>> (Pat, Mat, Tony, James, Geoff, JohnL, David)
>>>>
>>>> Any further opinions? A few people (BobH, Roger, Mark) have yet to
weigh
>>>> in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nikolich"
<paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
>>>>> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:19 AM
>>>>> Subject: [802SEC] straw poll on interim EC telecon meetings
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear EC members,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to get your feedback on holding an EC meeting via
teleconference
>>>>> between plenary sessions (for example in the 1st week of June, October
and
>>>>> February). My though is we'd hold a 2 hour telecon to make decisions
on
>>>>> time-critical items such as PAR approvals, Sponsor Ballot initiation
>>>>> approvals, RevCom submissions, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd make sure we'd have an agenda posted 30 days in advance an all the
>>>>> materials necessary to make such decisions available for review at
least
>>>>> one week before the telecon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts? Please provide your feedback by 23APR. I'll summarize the
>>>>> feedback and if the response is positive, I'd like us to consider
holding
>>>>> the first such meeting 1pm-3pm ET Friday 04JUN2010.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> --Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
>>>>> list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
>>>>> list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.