Paul,
I will probably not be available for 11 June - the meeting is scheduled to
begin at midnight where I will be (in Vietnam).
I can't commit to 10 October either - it's a Sunday and I may need to be
flying that day.
Roger
On 2010/04/26, at 06:02 PM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> Geoff, All,
>
> I thing the best thing for us to do is to have a 'trial' EC
teleconference 1-3pm ET 11June as a means of shaking down the
process. We can report the results of the trial-run to the members in
July, refine the process, and (perhaps) have the 1st 'official' interim
EC teleconference the 1st week of October.
>
> I'm pretty sure I can get web/teleconference services from the IEEE
that will provide adequate ports. I think 30 days advance notice of this
'trial-run' interim EC meeting should be sufficient.
>
> Tentative agenda--I will take requests for additional agenda items--but
I think it would be useful to cover the following:
>
> 0) Engage in debate regarding an effective way to implement a regular
"interm EC teleconference" in OCT, FEB and JUN. -- 30 minutes
> 1) 802 WG/TAG updates--any items coming out of the WG/TAG interim
sessions the EC should be aware of? now is the time to bring them up --
30 minutes
> 2) 802 Overview and Architecture revision project status update -- 15
minutes
> 3) IEEE SA items--the SASB meetings start 15JUN--status update on the
Amazon single-copy sales channel project --5 minutes
> 4) IEEE SA BoG update -- report from May BoG meeting--10 minutes
> 5) spare time for other topics -- 30 minutes
>
> The toughest thing to do will be to find a time when all EC members are
available. I've suggested the time/date of 1-3pm ET 11JUN2010--all EC
members please keep that timeslot open and confirm you are
available. While your are at it--please reserve time for 1-3pm ET
01OCT2010 and 1-3pm ET 04FEB2011...
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Thompson" <thompson@ieee.org>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim
EC telecon meetings
>
>
>> Paul-
>> In my view, this proposal helps substantially except that we need to
be careful on the open meeting aspect.
>> That means that the conference calls would require:
>> - sufficient advance notice of the conference call
>> - sufficient distribution of the advance notice
>> - sufficient conference ports available for observers
>> And, since this would be a significant change in process (even if not
in rules) then I don't think we should do it until after the next Plenary
so that we can adjust the expectations of our constituency at that time.
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>> On 4/26/10 11:10 AM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> That is a very interesting suggestion--it gives us time to hash
things out in real time and then make a quick decision in non-real,
rule-compliant time...hmmm.
>>>
>>> --Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shellhammer, Steve"
<sshellha@QUALCOMM.COM>
>>> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of
interim EC telecon meetings
>>>
>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>> One way to deal with this is to hold a non-voting meeting where we
discuss motions and then to have a post-meeting electronic ballot, on
each motion. So the discussion could take place during the call. We
could even have a straw poll and it there is controversy discuss what the
controversy is.
>>>>
>>>> The main issue is the overhead of having the electronic
ballot. Maybe a simple spreadsheet could be used to combine all the
motions onto a single spreadsheet and people could just enter their
votes. It is more overhead but it would be helpful to the WGs on motions
to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom. We might end up with less
conditional motions to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom since WGs would
not have to wait 4 months.
>>>>
>>>> I believe this works with the current rules.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:34 AM
>>>> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>> Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of
interim EC telecon meetings
>>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>> I don't think 2 quite covers the response I gave. My points were
>>>> -- we already have continuous processing available via email votes
except for submittal of PARs to NesCom.
>>>> PARs to NesCom should continue to be an action taken only at plenaries
>>>> (except perhaps for corrigenda)
>>>> email is best for continuous processing of approval to go to sponsor
ballot or RevCom
>>>> -- therefore, I don't support having an interim EC meeting for
these, but I could see one to deal with the topics and coordination that
get short shrift during a busy plenary
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pat
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:04 PM
>>>> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>> Subject: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim
EC telecon meetings
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> So far the responses generally fall into two categories:
>>>>
>>>> 1) good idea, need to work out details, go for it
>>>> (Apurva, Buzz, Steve, Bruce, Jon, JohnH, Subir, Mike)
>>>>
>>>> 2) not a bad idea, have concerns, proceed with caution
>>>> (Pat, Mat, Tony, James, Geoff, JohnL, David)
>>>>
>>>> Any further opinions? A few people (BobH, Roger, Mark) have yet to
weigh
>>>> in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nikolich"
<paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
>>>>> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:19 AM
>>>>> Subject: [802SEC] straw poll on interim EC telecon meetings
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear EC members,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to get your feedback on holding an EC meeting via
teleconference
>>>>> between plenary sessions (for example in the 1st week of June,
October and
>>>>> February). My though is we'd hold a 2 hour telecon to make
decisions on
>>>>> time-critical items such as PAR approvals, Sponsor Ballot initiation
>>>>> approvals, RevCom submissions, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd make sure we'd have an agenda posted 30 days in advance an all the
>>>>> materials necessary to make such decisions available for review at
least
>>>>> one week before the telecon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts? Please provide your feedback by 23APR. I'll summarize the
>>>>> feedback and if the response is positive, I'd like us to consider
holding
>>>>> the first such meeting 1pm-3pm ET Friday 04JUN2010.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> --Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This
>>>>> list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This
>>>>> list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2834 - Release Date: 04/25/10
06:31:00