Re: [802SEC] +++EC Ballot+++IEEE802.20.2 Draft 1.0 forwarding to sponsor ballot - CLOSES MAY 9th 2009
Approve.
On 5/8/2009 5:53 AM, Klerer, Mark wrote:
> Dear EC Members,
>
>
>
> This is an update on the current vote count on the above ballot. If you have not yet voted I would appreciate your doing that at this time. If you have any questions feel free to contact me.
>
>
>
> The current vote count is as follows:
>
> Vote categories: APP DIS ABS DNV
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> VC Mat Sherman. DNV
>
> VC Pat Thaler. DNV
>
> ES Buzz Rigsbee. DNV
>
> RS James Gilb. DNV
>
> TR John Hawkins. DNV
>
> 01 Tony Jeffree. DNV
>
> 03 David Law. DNV
>
> 11 Bruce Kraemer. DNV
>
> 15 Bob Heile. DNV
>
> 16 Roger Marks. APP
>
> 17 John Lemon. DNV
>
> 18 Mike Lynch. DNV
>
> 19 Steve Shellhammer. DNV
>
> 20 Mark Klerer. APP
>
> 21 Vivek Gupta. DNV
>
> 22 Carl Stevenson. APP
>
> ME Geoff Thompson. non-voting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> TOTALS 3 0 0 13
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mark Klerer
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Dear EC members
>
> As a follow-up to my previous e-mail (attached) concerning the approval to advance 802.20.2 to sponsor ballot, Paul has authorized me to initiate a 10-day ballot for the following motion:
>
> "The EC approves forwarding Draft 1.0 of IEEE802.20.2 to Sponsor Ballot."
>
> Moved: Mark Klerer
>
> Seconded: Steve Shellhammer
>
> Start of ballot: 29 April, 2009
>
> End of ballot: 9 May or 24 hours after the last EC member votes.
>
> By way of background and recapitulation of the previous e-mail, on the WG Letter Ballot of 802.20.2 there was 1 no voter with 2 editorial comments and 1 technical comment. The two editorial comments, were accepted in principal (i.e. accommodated) and the technical comment was rejected. Details can be found in the attached spreadsheet. None of the resolutions to these comments required any changes to the draft and none were made. The resolution to the comments that were accommodated, were done to the satisfaction of the commenter who was present during the discussions. Given that no changes were made to the draft, the comment resolutions were all recirculated in a 15 day WG Letter Ballot for approval and for forwarding the draft to Sponsor Ballot. The result of the recirculation was 16-1-0. The one remaining no vote was by the original commenter on the basis of the original technical comment.
> Best regards,
>
> Mark Klerer
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.