Re: [802SEC] +++EC Ballot+++IEEE802.20.2 Draft 1.0 forwarding to sponsor ballot - CLOSES MAY 9th 2009
Mark,
Approve.
Regards,
Mike
+1.972.814.4901 Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Klerer, Mark
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:54 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Ballot+++IEEE802.20.2 Draft 1.0 forwarding to
sponsor ballot - CLOSES MAY 9th 2009
Importance: High
Dear EC Members,
This is an update on the current vote count on the above ballot. If you have
not yet voted I would appreciate your doing that at this time. If you have
any questions feel free to contact me.
The current vote count is as follows:
Vote categories: APP DIS ABS DNV
--------------------------------------------------
VC Mat Sherman. DNV
VC Pat Thaler. DNV
ES Buzz Rigsbee. DNV
RS James Gilb. DNV
TR John Hawkins. DNV
01 Tony Jeffree. DNV
03 David Law. DNV
11 Bruce Kraemer. DNV
15 Bob Heile. DNV
16 Roger Marks. APP
17 John Lemon. DNV
18 Mike Lynch. DNV
19 Steve Shellhammer. DNV
20 Mark Klerer. APP
21 Vivek Gupta. DNV
22 Carl Stevenson. APP
ME Geoff Thompson. non-voting
---------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 3 0
0 13
Best regards,
Mark Klerer
-------------------------------------------------
Dear EC members
As a follow-up to my previous e-mail (attached) concerning the approval to
advance 802.20.2 to sponsor ballot, Paul has authorized me to initiate a
10-day ballot for the following motion:
"The EC approves forwarding Draft 1.0 of IEEE802.20.2 to Sponsor Ballot."
Moved: Mark Klerer
Seconded: Steve Shellhammer
Start of ballot: 29 April, 2009
End of ballot: 9 May or 24 hours after the last EC member votes.
By way of background and recapitulation of the previous e-mail, on the WG
Letter Ballot of 802.20.2 there was 1 no voter with 2 editorial comments and
1 technical comment. The two editorial comments, were accepted in principal
(i.e. accommodated) and the technical comment was rejected. Details can be
found in the attached spreadsheet. None of the resolutions to these
comments required any changes to the draft and none were made. The
resolution to the comments that were accommodated, were done to the
satisfaction of the commenter who was present during the discussions. Given
that no changes were made to the draft, the comment resolutions were all
recirculated in a 15 day WG Letter Ballot for approval and for forwarding
the draft to Sponsor Ballot. The result of the recirculation was 16-1-0.
The one remaining no vote was by the original commenter on the basis of the
original technical comment.
Best regards,
Mark Klerer
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.