Re: [802SEC] November minutes and PARs for March meeting
Dear EC
The minutes say:
---------------------------
Shellhammer asked if we can bypass EC review just by a vote or if this
was a vote to suspend the rules.
Stevenson: Due to the IMT deadlines, it makes sense in this one instance
to delegate the responsibilities. This is not intended to set a ongoing
precedent.
Kraemer: It was prepared with the intention that it was within the rules.
Sherman did not see any issue with the rules.
---------------------
Based on the discussion and responses, I would say it is clear that one
effect of the vote is that the normal EC review, and hence vote, could
be bypassed in this case.
James Gilb
Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
> James and Paul,
>
> Thanks for posting the minutes. I have one question for the Chair. There was a motion to approve document 802.18-08/58r6. At the time it was stated that the effect of this motion was "the EC would not need to approve the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU." I questioned that statement at the time but the EC did not go thought the document in detail. I requested the Chair to provide an interpretation as to whether what was stated verbally was what the vote was about. Now that the minutes are posted I went over the document and I don't see anything stating that the EC does not have to vote on the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU.
>
> So my question to the Chair is "Does the approval of document 802.18-08/58r6 mean that the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU does not require EC approval?"
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James Gilb
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 7:40 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] November minutes and PARs for March meeting
>
> Dear EC members
>
> As a reminder, the minutes for the November EC meeting has been posted
> for a while. There will be a consent agenda item on the opening agenda
> to approve those minutes, so please take a moment (or a few hours) to
> review them prior to the approval of the agenda of the opening meeting.
>
> So far, I have received only two PARs for consideration at the March
> meeting. The deadline for announcing PARs and 5 Cs is approximately
> February 8, so I would suggest posting them now to avoid any issues.
>
> The PAR page on the EC website has been updated to reference these
> proposed PARs.
>
> James Gilb
> 802 EC Recording Secretary
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.