Re: [802SEC] November minutes and PARs for March meeting
James and Paul,
Thanks for posting the minutes. I have one question for the Chair. There was a motion to approve document 802.18-08/58r6. At the time it was stated that the effect of this motion was "the EC would not need to approve the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU." I questioned that statement at the time but the EC did not go thought the document in detail. I requested the Chair to provide an interpretation as to whether what was stated verbally was what the vote was about. Now that the minutes are posted I went over the document and I don't see anything stating that the EC does not have to vote on the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU.
So my question to the Chair is "Does the approval of document 802.18-08/58r6 mean that the IMT-Advanced submission to the ITU does not require EC approval?"
Regards,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James Gilb
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 7:40 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] November minutes and PARs for March meeting
Dear EC members
As a reminder, the minutes for the November EC meeting has been posted
for a while. There will be a consent agenda item on the opening agenda
to approve those minutes, so please take a moment (or a few hours) to
review them prior to the approval of the agenda of the opening meeting.
So far, I have received only two PARs for consideration at the March
meeting. The deadline for announcing PARs and 5 Cs is approximately
February 8, so I would suggest posting them now to avoid any issues.
The PAR page on the EC website has been updated to reference these
proposed PARs.
James Gilb
802 EC Recording Secretary
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.