Re: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
I don't have a problem with a single motion.
Regards,
Tony
At 22:55 18/06/2008, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>Pat,
>
>I agree, there is no need to be hasty. Let's get the EC feedback as
>you requested.
>
>--Paul
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com>
>To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>; "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 5:45 PM
>Subject: RE: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
>
>
>All,
>
>If anyone objects to the two PARs being included in a single motion,
>please let me know by tomorrow. In theory the two could be done in
>separate motions, but when we do two very similar motions, it can be
>confusing so if there are no objections I would prefer to run this as
>one motion covering both PARs.
>
>Paul,
>
>Crafting. I think there is no need to put this motion up in haste and it
>would be better to give people the chance to say if they want the two
>items divided before starting the motion.
>
>Regards,
>Pat
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
>[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
>Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:23 AM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
>
>All,
>
>Based on Pat's analysis, I rule that a motion to suspend the 30 day rule
>is
>in order.
>
>Pat, please craft the text for the motion being precise as to exactly
>what
>rule is being suspended and for how long the suspension is in effect,
>obtain
>a second, and I'll conduct an EC email ballot on the motion.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.