Re: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
Pat,
I agree, there is no need to be hasty. Let's get the EC feedback as you
requested.
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>; "Paul Nikolich"
<paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 5:45 PM
Subject: RE: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
All,
If anyone objects to the two PARs being included in a single motion,
please let me know by tomorrow. In theory the two could be done in
separate motions, but when we do two very similar motions, it can be
confusing so if there are no objections I would prefer to run this as
one motion covering both PARs.
Paul,
Crafting. I think there is no need to put this motion up in haste and it
would be better to give people the chance to say if they want the two
items divided before starting the motion.
Regards,
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:23 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802.11 PARs for Friday's agenda
All,
Based on Pat's analysis, I rule that a motion to suspend the 30 day rule
is
in order.
Pat, please craft the text for the motion being precise as to exactly
what
rule is being suspended and for how long the suspension is in effect,
obtain
a second, and I'll conduct an EC email ballot on the motion.
Regards,
--Paul
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.