Re: [802SEC] Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification--postpone to July?
Isn't it likely to be irrelevant by then? If the 802.20 sponsor ballot
draft gets sent to RevCom shortly, as looks likely, it would likely be
approved at the June Standards Board meeting. Yes? And therefore the
SASB would likely vote to end the UC-EC at the same June meeting, per
our request to them that they end the UC-EC (and other 802.20 special
conditions) once 802.20 has been approved. Yes?
On 5/8/2008 12:15 PM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> Dear EC members,
>
> Determining Mark Klerer's unconflicted or conflicted classification
> has become complicated and convoluted.
>
> Mark Klerer is willing to remain unclassified until the UC-EC makes a
> final determination (see below). Unless someone objects with good
> reason, I'd like to postpone Mark's classification until the July08
> plenary session, when we can debate this face-to-face (if necessary.)
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Klerer, Mark" <mklerer@QUALCOMM.COM>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to
> determine Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes
> not later than 5MAY+++
>
>
>> EC Members,
>>
>> In the interest of saving time and focusing on more constructive
>> efforts, I am willing to live with conflicted status in the hope that
>> we get the current draft through the SA soon and then hopefully get
>> rid of the UC-EC subcommittee.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.