Re: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later than 5MAY+++
Steve -
I guess it depends whether membership of the UC-EC is the default
(i.e., that conflicted members have to be actively excluded) or
whether non-membership is the default and therefore membership of the
UC-EC is by invitation only (i.e., unconflicted members have to be
actively included).
Regards,
Tony
At 22:17 06/05/2008, you wrote:
>Paul,
>
> The motion was to NOT add him to the UC-EC roster. The motion
>failed so I assume now classified as Unconflicted. If the motion had
>passed he would NOT have been classified as Unconflicted, but of course
>the motion failed.
>
> Isn't that correct? Two negatives make a positive. I
>personally would have worded the original motion without the negative,
>since it is more complicated.
>
>Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
>[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
>Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:04 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine
>Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later
>than 5MAY+++
>
>Dear EC members,
>
> The final tally on the below motion is 2 Approve, 3 Disapprove, 1
>Abstain.
>Approve: Hawkins, Lemon
>Disapprove: Jeffree, Rigsbee, Lynch
>Abstain: Heile
>Did Note Vote: none
>
>The motion fails--the UC-EC disapproves "not adding Klerer to the UC-EC
>roster". This leaves Klerer's classification as conflicted or not as
>undecided. I am open to further motions enabling the UC-EC to resolve
>this
>matter.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> > To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:07 PM
> > Subject: [802SEC] +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine Mark
>Klerer's
> > unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later than 5MAY+++
> >
> >
> >> Dear UC-EC members,
> >>
> >> The following motion made by John Lemon and seconded by John Hawkins.
> >>
> >> Whereas, Mark Klerer could be considered by a reasonable person to
>have a
> >> personal interest in the outcome of votes on matters concerning IEEE
> >> P802.20, Mark Klerer shall not be added to the Unconflicted EC
>roster.
> >>
> >> This is a 10 day email ballot of the UC-EC. The ballot closes 24
>hours
> >> after the sooner of when all eligible UC-EC voting members (John
>Hawkins,
> >> Buzz Rigsbee, Mike Lynch, Tony Jeffree, Bob Heile, John Lemon and
>Paul
> >> Nikolich if needed to break a tie) have cast a ballot or 05MAY2008.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> --Paul
> >>
> >> ----------
> >> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> >> This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This
> > list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.