Re: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine Mark Klerer's unconflicted/conflicted classification+++closes not later than 5MAY+++
Paul,
If I interpret you statement correctly, Mark has not been added to the
unconflicted EC. Rather he has not been prohibited from the
unconflicted EC. I find this whole process terribly convoluted. I'd do
this myself, but I can't because I'm 'conflicted'.
Can some unconflicted EC member PLEASE make a motion to "add Mark Klerer
to the unconflicted EC"? It will either fail or pass, and then we will
at least know Mark's status.
Thanks!
Mat
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Engineering Fellow
BAE Systems - Network Systems (NS)
Office: +1 973.633.6344
Cell: +1 973.229.9520
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:18 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to
determine Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes
not later than 5MAY+++
Paul,
The motion was to NOT add him to the UC-EC roster. The motion
failed so I assume now classified as Unconflicted. If the motion had
passed he would NOT have been classified as Unconflicted, but of course
the motion failed.
Isn't that correct? Two negatives make a positive. I
personally would have worded the original motion without the negative,
since it is more complicated.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:04 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] final tally +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine
Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later
than 5MAY+++
Dear EC members,
The final tally on the below motion is 2 Approve, 3 Disapprove, 1
Abstain.
Approve: Hawkins, Lemon
Disapprove: Jeffree, Rigsbee, Lynch
Abstain: Heile
Did Note Vote: none
The motion fails--the UC-EC disapproves "not adding Klerer to the UC-EC
roster". This leaves Klerer's classification as conflicted or not as
undecided. I am open to further motions enabling the UC-EC to resolve
this
matter.
Regards,
--Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:07 PM
> Subject: [802SEC] +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine Mark
Klerer's
> unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later than 5MAY+++
>
>
>> Dear UC-EC members,
>>
>> The following motion made by John Lemon and seconded by John Hawkins.
>>
>> Whereas, Mark Klerer could be considered by a reasonable person to
have a
>> personal interest in the outcome of votes on matters concerning IEEE
>> P802.20, Mark Klerer shall not be added to the Unconflicted EC
roster.
>>
>> This is a 10 day email ballot of the UC-EC. The ballot closes 24
hours
>> after the sooner of when all eligible UC-EC voting members (John
Hawkins,
>> Buzz Rigsbee, Mike Lynch, Tony Jeffree, Bob Heile, John Lemon and
Paul
>> Nikolich if needed to break a tie) have cast a ballot or 05MAY2008.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --Paul
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.