Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Proposed P&P Revision Ballot titled 'P&P Revision Process'



Mat,

I vote disapprove.  I think the changes the LMSC approves each plenary 
session should be given some sort of formal status ('approved but 
pending'?)at the close of the plenary session, even if they don't become 
effective at that time.  I don't like the ambiguity associated with how long 
it will take the aforementioned 'approved but pending' P&P revisions to be 
Audcom approved and posted.  I also think 802 should be responsible for at 
least keeping a link on its website which takes a user to the audcom website 
which then serves up the approved 802 P&P.

Regards,

--Paul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Proposed P&P Revision Ballot titled 'P&P Revision Process'


Folks,



Sorry to spring this at the last minute, but it should be obvious that
our current P&P revision process is in conflict with requirements of the
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operation Manual.  While the SBOM takes
precedence, we still should update our P&P to be consistent.



The attached revision ballot is fairly short, and addresses this issue.
It also leaves open the possibility of further improving our revision
process based on interactions with AudCom, or other concerns from EC
members.



Let me know if you have any comments.



Regards,



Mat



Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Engineering Fellow
BAE Systems -  Network Systems (NS)
Office: +1 973.633.6344
Cell: +1 973.229.9520
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com






----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This 
list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.