Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector

["Bob O'Hara (boohara)" <boohara@CISCO.COM>]

Speaking of our policy on restrictive notices.... Every one of the
messages in this thread are being caught by our filter for those notices
and sent to me for moderation.  Please edit the message you are replying
to, eliminating that offensive phrase.  Otherwise, your message may
suffer significant delay, until I notice it needs my approval to post to
the list.


 -Bob
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:gthompso@NORTEL.COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:42 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector

Paul-

Where you say:
         "- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'c-blah-blah

and pro-blah-blah'"

You should say:
         "- any communication that has been explicitly deemed as
possibly 
'c-blah-blah and/or pro-blah-blah'"

...to match our policy regarding restrictive notices.

Geoff


In a message dated 7/26/2005 5:35:31 PM Central Standard Time,
>paul.nikolich@ATT.NET writes:
>Dear EC Members,
>
>Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to whether or
not it
>is appropriate to put the attachment with high level contract terms in
>Buzz's motion on the reflector.  I decided it was acceptable because
the EC
>has had similar information from Buzz included in their minutes in the
past.
>
>The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post onto the
reflector
>remains, however.  We don't have any crisp guidelines.  I would like to
hear
>from the EC members on what they think is an appropriate set of
guidelines
>on this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.
>
>To get the list started, in my opinion the following information should
be
>kept private:
>
>- final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the other hand,
high
>level summary of terms and conditions are appropriate for posting)
>- any personal information (all reflector traffic should be strictly
802
>business related)
>- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'c-blah-blah and
>pro-blah-blah'
>- any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 'executive
>privilege'
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This 
>list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.