Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Motion for Network Equipment Upgradesl+++ends 19 August 2005
All,
I agree with Pat, we should not get in the business of having IEEE802
or our agents (Verilan) touching people's laptops, the risks far far
outweigh the benefits.
I believe we have to advertise to our antendees the advantage of
having tri-mode support on their PC and leaving the decision to
them and their companies on the investment.
mike
Pat Thaler wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I'm not convinced that providing loaner cards was a good idea back then, but things are also different today: Wireless is much more adopted. Most travelers have some form of it already on their laptops. In at least half the hotel rooms I stay in, the connection in the room is wireless rather than wired further encouraging people to have it.
>
> Also, I think when we provided the loaners, we signed out the card and the installation disk - the user was the one who installed it. What Buzz is talking about here is our network provider doing the support for the installation including making sure the BIOS on the laptop is up to date. I think our network provider doing BIOS upgrades on people's laptops (something my company would not approve of me doing) is significantly more liability then having a person from our meeting planner hand a person a card and a driver disk.
>
> Many of our companies are also a lot more security conscious now. I don't think we should get into providing a service that most of our attendees can't take advantage of without violating their company IT policy. If an attendee wants to violate that policy on their own, that is their business.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) [mailto:matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM]
> Sent: Monday, 25 July, 2005 12:32 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Motion for Network Equipment Upgradesl+++ends 19 August 2005
>
> Paul,
>
> Minimally we should make people sign a waiver. Didn't we use to provide
> loaner cards in the past? How did we deal with it back then? What is
> different today?
>
> Mat
>
> Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
> Senior Member Technical Staff
> BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> Office: +1 973.633.6344
> email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Kerry [mailto:stuart.kerry@PHILIPS.COM]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 3:26 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Motion for Network Equipment
> Upgradesl+++ends 19 August 2005
>
> Paul,
>
> I approve the Network AP upgrades ONLY. But do not agree to the Tri-Mode
> interface cards on the grounds of liability to 802 on Company or
> Individual members machines being subject to failures or corruption of
> those machines. Indeed my company will not allow this and it is a
> serious
> offence to do so. To this end, I explained my reasoning at the closing
> EC
> meeting on Friday. Not a good idea in my view. We should encourage them
> to
> get them, BUT NOT to provide them. To which end, if there is an EC
> motion
> to do this then I will DISAPPROVE the idea.
>
> / Stuart
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@ATT.NET]
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 3:49 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Motion for Network Equipment
> Upgradesl+++ends 19 August 2005
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> This is a email ballot to make a determination on the below motion.
>
> Motion:
> "Whereas our Network Manager, Tim Godfrey, has recommended that we
> proceed
> with acquisition of the 802.11a modules for our Cisco 1200 APs that are
> not currently so equipped, and that we make an effort to encourage our
> attendees to migrate to 802.11a for reduced congestion:
>
>
> I move that we proceed to acquire those additional 802.11a modules (20),
> and further that we investigate a promotional deal to encourage more of
> our attendees to upgrade to Tri-Mode (802.11b, 11g, 11a) interface
> cards,
> which would also allow us to regulate client transmit power levels in
> dense configurations. Terms of deal will be reviewed with the Network
> Services Advisory Committee, and presented for final approval by the 802
> EC prior to implementation."
>
>
> Moved: Rigsbee
> Second: Hawkins
>
> The ballot opens 7PM ET Sunday 24 July 2005 and closes Friday 19 August
> 2005 2005.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
--
Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.