| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Matt, I
vote Disapprove. I agree with the others
who say that saying the Chair can suspend an EC member’s voting rights
with cause is inappropriate. I would accept that the EC could vote to remove
an EC member’s voting rights with cause, but not the chair all by
himself. A simple majority of the EC would be sufficient. The LMSC Chair may suspend voting rights
of an EC member with cause. I know the following text
was not been modified; however, it needs to be. It does not explain what “assign”
means. And for that matter the sentence does not say much. The
process for approving the change is already described below. So it is
clear what it takes to pass, otherwise, it fails. Where does this middle
of the road “assign” come from? If it fails you can always
submit a modified change request, and try again. I would recommend
deleting the sentence. The
Executive Committee shall approve, assign, or fail to accept the proposal. Regards, Steve From:
owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]
On Behalf Of Dear
EC members, Attached
you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision ballot on EC Voting Rules. This ballot was
approved at the Friday November 19, 2004 EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at
the meeting. The purpose and rationale for the ballot are as given in the
attached ballot document. Ballot
Duration: 1/8/2005 - 2/8/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST WG/TAG
chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your groups, and invite them to comment
through you. Thanks
& Regards, Mat <<802.0-EC_Voting_Rules-P&P_Revision_ballot.pdf>>
Senior
Member Technical Staff BAE
SYSTEMS, CNIR Office:
+1 973.633.6344 email:
matthew.sherman@baesystems.com |