Tony,
Because of my work schedule I’m
trying to find something on Friday. I’m open to other suggestions. The
problem is the west coast. I’m also open to an alternating schedule. It
is early enough I can still change the time of the announce meeting. Please
suggest….
Thanks,
Mat
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
From:
owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On
Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005
4:35 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Of Ballots
and Telecons....
Mat -
Slight problem with the time zone calcs there - it is Fridays, 4:30 - 6:30 UK time, but
that doesn't help me much. Still a very unfriendly time for me.
Regards,
Tony
At 08:46 08/01/2005, Tony Jeffree
wrote:
Mat -
In the spirit of internationalization that seems to be high in our consciousness
at the moment, I strongly object to your choice of time for telecons (that
works out as Friday, 6:30PM through 8:30 PM UK time), which is a maximally
unfriendly time for me, being well after normal working hours at the start of a
weekend. If the timing remains there, my chances of making any of these
telecons is very slim indeed, so I regard that choice as effectively
disenfranchising me from the process.
Regards,
Tony
At 05:38 08/01/2005, Sherman,
Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
Folks,
I realize
I’m pummeling everyone with all these ballots and telecons. I do
want to be as accommodating as possible. For various reasons,
Fridays work out best for me to hold these meetings. I chose lunch time
because I felt it was a reasonable compromise between all the time zones.
I am
open to other times if people feel they would work
better. Please let me know if there are preferences.
One
last point. I notice that some EC members seem never to
participate in the P&P revision process. I was hoping that the
telecom format would ease that issue somewhat. I’ve also suggested
sending delegates to the comment resolution to help ease the load. If
people chose not to participate, I think it’s bad but I can accept
it. What I really don’t want is that we spend months
discussing things and resolving things and then someone who didn’t
participate in the process objects at the final vote. I am hoping that
people who choose not to participate will give those that did the benefit of
the doubt and not block their work when the final vote comes. I am also
open to other ideas for making the process more convenient and easier for
everyone. Right now, this is the best I can come up with given the goals
we have set. Please let me know if you have comments on the process.
Regards,
Mat
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email:
matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
Regards,
Tony
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.