Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Allocation of Funds for the Acquisition of Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting Network Support
After some consideration, I vote Approve.
According to the datasheet found at the following URL:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_data_sheet09186a00800937a6.html#wp1001907
the transmit power levels for the "K9" AP are adjustable.
For the 802.11a radio, the transmit power level can be set to
40 mW (16 dBm)
20 mW (13 dBm)
10 mW (10 dBm)
5 mw (7 dBm)
For the 802.11b radio, the transmit power level can be set to
100 mW (20 dBm)
50 mW (17 dBm)
30 mW (15 dBm)
20 mW (13 dBm)
10 mW (10 dBm)
5 mW (7 dBm)
1 mW (0 dBm)
The same transmit power levels are available for the 802.11g
radio when using CCK. When using OFDM, the transmit power
levels for the 802.11g radio can be set to
30 mW (15 dBm)
20 mW (13 dBm)
10 mW (10 dBm)
5 mW (7 dBm)
1 mW (0 dBm)
The "K9" also has both omni and hemispherical 5 GHz antennas, as
well as two RP-TNC connectors for external antennas.
Being more familiar with "conductively enabled" network technology,
I profess no expertise in the area of "dielectrically enabled" networks,
so I may be misinterpretting both the facts and the implications of
this data. I will note that the "K9" can be "conductively empowered",
which would seem to be a good thing, though the datasheet makes no
mention of IEEE Std 802.3af-2003.
My knowledge of APs is very limited, so I don't know if other
commercially available units provide similar capabilities. I
do think that a price of $700 per "K9" is far too expensive. However,
when one considers the discount we will receive on the first 24 units,
and the price that Buzz has found for the remaining 20 units, the
average cost per unit would work out to be approximately $337,
and this seems reasonable, given the capabilities of the device.
I assume that the $567 price that Buzz found is for a dual radio/tri-mode
device.
I started with the same objections as Bob and Mat. If my analysis
is incorrect, then I will change my vote to Disapprove.
Howard
Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
> Bob,
>
>
>
> I think you are making an implication here that there is no power
> control. If there is power control, I'm not sure that this is an issue.
>
>
>
> Mat
>
>
>
> Matthew Sherman, PhD
> Senior Member Technical Staff
> BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> Office: +1 973.633.6344
> email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Bob O'Hara
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:55 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Allocation of Funds for
> the Acquisition of Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting
> Network Support
>
> Buzz,
>
>
>
> If that is true, then our service provider needs to learn a bit more
> about wireless. The Cisco APs are among the "hottest" (highest
> transmit power) APs available. This is not compatible with a high
> density environment. In a high density environment, the need is for
> APs to be closer together and operating at lower power, to increase
> the overall capacity of the entire WLAN. If the transmit power is
> high and the APs are placed close together, the APs wind up
> interfering with each other and reducing the overall capacity of the
> WLAN. The more APs you put into the WLAN, the lower the capacity
> gained by each AP.
>
>
>
> -Bob
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org on behalf of Rigsbee,
> Everett O
> Sent: Thu 5/6/2004 2:29 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Allocation of Funds for
> the Acquisition of Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting
> Network Support
>
> Bob, The Cisco AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 is the only unit our service
> provider, IDEAL Technology, would recommend for our type of high
> density configurations.
>
>
>
> Thanx, Buzz
> Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
> Boeing - SSG
> PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
> Seattle, WA 98124-2207
> (425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
> everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob O'Hara [mailto:bob@AIRESPACE.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:14 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Allocation of Funds for
> the Acquisition of Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting
> Network Support
>
>
>
> Disapprove. There is no need to purchase this equipment at this
> price. There are plenty of other solutions that are better and cost
> less (my own company's, for example). Cisco's equipment, even at
> the "discounted" $700 is absolutely the most expensive and lowest
> performance that you can buy.
>
>
>
> -Bob
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org on behalf of Paul Nikolich
> Sent: Wed 5/5/2004 4:37 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ Allocation of Funds for the
> Acquisition of Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting Network
> Support
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> This is a 10 day email ballot to make a determination on the below
> motion to allocate additional funds for equipment purchase.
>
>
>
> The ballot opens 8PM EDT 5May 2004 and closes 8PM EDT 15May 2004.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
>
>
>
>
>
> Motion:
>
> Whereas the 802 EC had approved $7,500 for acquisition of 44
> Wireless Access Points (WAPs) at the closing EC meeting in Orlando; and
>
> Whereas Cisco Systems has now generously agreed to provide 24 of
> those WAPs to IEEE 802 for a substantially discounted net value of
> $3500; and
>
> Whereas that leaves us with the need to acquire 20 additional WAPs
> on the retail market at an estimated $700 each (total = $14K); and
>
> Whereas we therefore need to allocate an additional $10K to complete
> the acquisition of the needed equipment in time for our Portland
> plenary session;
>
> Therefore be it resolved that: the IEEE 802 Executive Committee
> approves expenditure of up to an additional $10K for Acquisition of
> Wireless Access Points for Plenary Meeting Network Support (total of
> $17,500 for the 44 WAPs).
>
>
> Moved: Rigsbee Seconded: Heile
>
>
>
> Yes ________ No ________ Abstain ________
>
> ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This
> email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from
> the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained
> by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive
> Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.