Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing standards to IEEE 802




You are correct - it was suppose to be "I do not think" 

Pat 

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:gthompso@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:31 PM
To: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1)
Cc: carlstevenson@agere.com; r.b.marks@ieee.org; bob.grow@intel.com;
stds-802-sec@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing
standards to IEEE 802


Pat-

Is what you typed what you meant?

You think that the (immature and untested) CAG should be able to force its 
will on the established process?

I would guess that meant to type a "not" in there.


At 07:20 PM 2/12/2004 -0700, pat_thaler@agilent.com wrote:
>However, I do think an ability of the CAG to force entity voting by 
>writing a PAR is appropriate or correct.


Geoff