RE: Letter to IEEE 802 SEC
I am much more comfortable with Paul's recommendations than with the words in
the letters presented to us and could support submitting such re-written
letters.
Best regards.
Robert D. Love
Program Manager, IBM ACS - US
Chair IEEE 802.5 Token Ring Working Group
IBM
500 Park Offices Phone: 919 543-2746
P. O. Box 12195 CNPA/656 Fax: 419 715-0359
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA E-Mail: rdlove@us.ibm.com
Paul Nikolich <p.nikolich@ieee.org> on 10/03/99 08:54:27 PM
To: "THALER,PAT (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <pat_thaler@am.exch.hp.com>, Jim Carlo
<jcarlo@ti.com>, IEEE802 <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
cc:
Subject: RE: Letter to IEEE 802 SEC
Colleagues,
I agree with Pat, the letter has misinterpreted the SA rules and
procedures. Liaison letters aren't the same as standards. I don't agree
with the request the letter from HomeRF that 802 issue another leetter
rebutting our original position not in favor of the WBFH NPRM.
We should issue a letter to the FCC indicating the 802.11 and 802.15
committee's concern with the proposed rules changes for reasons along the
lines articulated by Roger Marks--and we should make it clear it comes from
a subcommittee within 802.11, 802's wireless LAN working group. It also
would be a good idea to at least mention what rationale for the minority
position within 802.11 is. The objective here is to fairly represent both
points of view developed within 802.
--Paul
At 10:42 AM 10/1/99 -0600, THALER,PAT (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
>
>Jim and colleagues,
>
>The letter submitted to Jim claims procedural flaws in part by reading the
>IEEE Standards Bylaws which apply to approval of standards as applying to
>the approval of these letters. I strongly disagree with such a position.
>The letters are liaison letters which are greatly different from standards
>both in their impact and in the time constraints on their development and
>the IEEE has separate rules for the approval of liaison positions.
>
>Regards,
>Pat
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Carlo [mailto:jcarlo@ti.com]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 5:50 AM
>To: IEEE802
>Subject: Letter to IEEE 802 SEC
>
>
>I receive the following letter form several companies regarding the ongoing
>vote for submitting two letters to the FCC. It is late at night, so I have
>not read the material, but am simply passing the information.
>
>Jim Carlo(jcarlo@ti.com) Cellular:1-214-693-1776 Voice&Fax:1-214-853-5274
>TI Fellow, Networking Standards at Texas Instruments
>Chair, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 Telecom and Info Exchange Between Systems
>Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Berger, Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Berger@icn.siemens.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 4:32 PM
>To: Carlo, Jim (E-mail)
>Subject: Letter to IEEE 802 SEC
>
>
>Jim,
>
>I would like to thank you for this opportunity to address the SEC on this
>important issue. Attached is the letter I told you we would be sending. I
>will look forward to working with you and a speedy resoluion to this
>question.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Stephen
>
> <<Letter to 802 SEC - v4.doc>>
>