| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
I thought the purpose of the penalty was to encourage people to stay at the hotel to fill up the block that IEEE promised to fill. If that promise has been kept then why penalize people who are unable to stay in a full hotel? Just to
get the added $$$ in IEEE coffers? Seems wrong. Care to justify this decision? Dan. -- "the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." – Marcus Aurelius On 10/4/24, 11:58 AM, "***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** on behalf of Clint Chaplin" <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org on behalf of
clint.chaplin@GMAIL.COM> wrote: After some discussion, the decision is to not allow a sold-out hotel to be an uexcuse to waive the penalty for not staying in the hotel. --
Clint Chaplin To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |