Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
👍. Has the charm that it is not wrong.
Ben
From: thompson@ieee.org <thompson@ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 12:31 PM To: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@gmail.com>; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Cc: Geoff Thompson <thompson@ieee.org> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Preamble update for 802 LMSC response to adminstrations How about:
Geoff
On Friday, August 4, 2023, 12:20:52 PM PDT, Benjamin Rolfe <ben@blindcreek.com> wrote:
if it ain't broke...screw with it until it is 😉.
(in other words I agree with you)
B
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org> on behalf of Geoff Thompsonend <thompson@IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 9:49 AM To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Preamble update for 802 LMSC response to adminstrations Edward/Colleagues-
I don't agree with the change.
1. I don't find any flaw in the old text. What is the alledged flaw?
2. I do find flaws in the text proposed by the consultation with staff. The IEEE-SA occasionally adopts standards developed elsewhere without change. That is contrary to the proposed statement.
I do believe that the SA as a whole is adequately described and advertised in the closing paragraph. Our old text is accurate in NOT saying that we speak for any of the IEEE outside the bounds of 802. I believe that the market success of IEEE
802 Wireless standards is sufficient to provide the weight to our input to regulatory bodies that we seek.
In summary, I oppose the change.
Sincerely,
Geoff Thompson
802 EC Member Emeritus, Life Senior Member
On Friday, August 4, 2023, 08:33:04 AM PDT, Edward Au <edward.ks.au@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Paul and colleagues,
In the most recent 802.18 weekly teleconference call when we reviewed a draft submission to an administration, a participant raised a good comment that the following phrase may not be exactly true: "IEEE 802 LMSC is a leading consensus-based industry standards body" that we always use as a preamble on an introduction of IEEE 802 LMSC. Thanks to the discussion among Paul, Jodi, and Yvette, the phrase is now updated as "IEEE is a leading consensus-based standards developing organization". For completeness, I copy and paste the updated preamble below for your reference: IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) thanks Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) for issuing the consultation “Public consultation on proposed Malaysia’s positions for World Radiocommunication Conference 2023 (WRC-23) agenda items” and for the opportunity to provide feedback on this topic. IEEE 802 LMSC is a committee of the IEEE Standards Association and Technical Activities, two of the Major Organizational Units of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). IEEE has about 400,000 members in over 160 countries. IEEE’s core purpose is to foster technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity. In submitting this document, IEEE 802 LMSC acknowledges and respects that other components of IEEE Organizational Units may have perspectives that differ from, or compete with, those of IEEE 802 LMSC. Therefore, this submission should not be construed as representing the views of IEEE as a whole[1]. ________________________________ [1] This document solely represents the views of IEEE 802 LMSC and does not necessarily represent a position of either the IEEE or the IEEE Standards Association. ------------ Regards, Edward To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |