Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Ofcom response proposed editorial

Perhaps it’s just me, but it still sounds awkward. However, it’s understandable.

Patrick Kinney
Kinney Consulting
+1.847.960.3715
pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com

On Feb 3, 2022, at 09:37, Jay Holcomb <jholcomb@ieee.org> wrote:



hi Roger,

 

Thomas saw your point on the line in the Ofcom response and here is a proposed replacement line:

 

“There are still 15 GHz of spectrum left in IEEE Std 802.15.3d-2017 that can be used only under the regime of footnote 5.565, where protection of passive service from harmful interference is required.”

 

I think it does work pretty well; are you okay with this editorial edit?

 

thanks

jay 

 

 



To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1