- To: "Andrew Myles (amyles)" <amyles@cisco.com>
- Subject: Results of IEEE 802 Future meeting vision ad hoc meeting on 14 Oct 2021
- From: "Andrew Myles (amyles)" <amyles@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:23:04 +0000
- Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
- Authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
- Cc: "STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- Thread-index: AdfBgJkE/rN3fgOoQ7Go7BLzdUJvMA==
- Thread-topic: Results of IEEE 802 Future meeting vision ad hoc meeting on 14 Oct 2021
|
G’day all Thank you for those (all bcc’ed) who attended today’s IEEE 802 Future meeting vision ad hoc. The agenda a notes from today’s meeting are in
ec-21-0227-04. Given we have at least one more submission in the hopper (from Ben Rolfe), I propose we have another one hour session in two weeks’ time, but one hour later to avoid clashing again with 802.18 WG. I will send the invitation shortly. The short term goal of these discussions is to focus on:
Submissions are requested. It is easy to criticise, and so if you highlight remote-only has not worked for some activity, please put some real effort into proposing a way to fix the identified issue(s). Also please focus on actual examples
rather than strawmen. So far we have had submissions from:
Would anyone else like to volunteer to present their experiences? I would like to undertake more discussion off line, and to this end I will consult with the IEEE 802 EC leadership on how they would like to do this, in a manner that is open and yet does not fill the IEEE 802 EC reflector.
| ||||||
--- End Message ---