| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
I can reach out to some of my automotive contacts (GM, Ford, Bosch, VW) if that would help. In working on automotive ethernet, I have found their EM requirements quite challenging and specialized. Having strong involvement, I believe,
would be essential to forming up a project if it is to have an automotive component.
From: pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com <pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
Hi George; Good points and question. While I have some understanding of various EM environments, I would also like some automotive industry expertise in the group. I will put this question to Prof Ryuji Kohno and request him to respond back in a
timely fashion. Sincerely, Pat On 18, Mar2021, at 10:04, George Zimmerman <george@cmephyconsulting.com> wrote: Pat – thank you for the updates. I had not realized that the Body Area Networks combined automotive bodies as well as human bodies (I had thought they were human body networks). Having done a bit of work in automotive networking, I am
somewhat familiar with the EM environment there, and it seems substantially different from what a human body would ordinarily deal with, including issues of compatibility, interference tolerance with high-levels of EM signals often due to interactions of the
automotive body with EM fields. I would have thought that these (automotive and human networks) are two different problems, requiring different environmental expertise. Is the expertise present in the proposed SG from the automotive industry? -george From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> On
Behalf Of pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com Dear EC members; This is an update to the email I sent on Tuesday, 16 March showing the 6 motions I will present at the closing 802 EC meeting. The 6 motions to presented to the EC, (4 motions are
for the formation of Study Groups as mentioned in the opening meeting, as well as two motions for unconditional approval to forward drafts to RevCom) have been updated with 802.15 WG voting results. Approve the formation of Study Groups 1) Approve the formation of an 802.15 SG15.6a Study Group to consider development of a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) responses for IEEE Std 802.15.6 amendment:
for enhanced dependability. See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/21/15-21-0138-00-0000-short-descriptions-of-4-sg-formation-requests-from-802-15-wg.docx for
supporting documentation Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG Result:35/1/5]
2) Approve the formation of an 802.15 SG15.4ab Study Group to consider development of a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) responses for IEEE Std 802.15.4 amendment:
Enhanced Ultra Wide-Band (UWB) Physical Layers (PHYs) and Associated MAC Enhancements. See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/21/15-21-0138-00-0000-short-descriptions-of-4-sg-formation-requests-from-802-15-wg.docx for
supporting documentation Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG Result:43/0/1]
3) Approve the formation of an 802.15 SG15.14 Study Group to consider development of a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) responses for a new IEEE 802.15 standard
focused only on Ultra-Wide-Band (UWB) devices. See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/21/15-21-0138-00-0000-short-descriptions-of-4-sg-formation-requests-from-802-15-wg.docx for
supporting documentation Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG Result:41/2/2]
4) Approve the formation of an 802.15 SG15.15 Study Group to consider development of a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) responses for a new IEEE 802.15 standard
focused only on Narrow Band (NB) types of devices. See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/21/15-21-0138-00-0000-short-descriptions-of-4-sg-formation-requests-from-802-15-wg.docx for
supporting documentation Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG Result:38/0/2] Unconditional to RevCom motions: P802.15.4y, P802.15.9rev1 1) P802.15.4y to RevCom (Unconditional) Approve sending P802.15.4y-D04 to RevCom. Approve CSD documentation in https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/18/ec-18-0084-00-ACSD-802-15-4y.docx Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG CSD Result:36/0/1] [802.15 WG to RevCom Result: 36/0/1] ============================ 2) P802.15.9rev1 to RevCom (Unconditional) Approve sending P802.15.9rev1-D05 to RevCom. Approve CSD documentation in https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/20/ec-20-0250-00-ACSD-p802-15-9-revision-1.docx Moved: Kinney Seconded: Holcomb Result: Yes: x, No: x, Abstain: x [802.15 WG CSD Result: 36/0/2] [802.15 WG to RevCom Result: 36/0/2] Sincerely, Pat Begin forwarded message:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |