| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
James, 1) Abstain 2) 5 3) One year trial, during which time we work with SA to pay for it in the future. Note, that in the future the number of licenses will go up, since companies may choose to use those provided by the IEEE. Steve -----Original Message----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- All I guess I should reply to my own straw poll 1) Yes 2) 5 3) Seems like SA should pay for this, they will probably get a better rate. James Gilb On 8/7/20 2:55 PM, James P. K. Gilb wrote: > All > > All voting members, please respond to this straw poll. Others are, of
> course, allowed to express their opinion as well. I will be bugging
> all the voting members to respond. > > Questions: > 1) Do you support a 1 year trial of the IEEE 802 LMSC paying for
> Framemaker license rental for Technical Editors who would not
> otherwise receive funding from their employer or affiliation. > > Yes/No: > > 2) If the IEEE 802 LMSC decides to do this, how many licenses should
> be purchased? > > Enter an positive integer: > > 3) Please feel free to provide other comments: > > Free form text field here: > > Thanks > > James Gilb > > ---------- > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 |