Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] infrastructure



Glenn

My two cents ahead of the July 7 meeting

Not all WG solutions are connecting to a LAN.

For example the IEEE P802.3cw and P802.3ct projects are defining solutions that connect to a DWDM-based DCI interconnect system – clearly not a LAN.

While I understand your point – the proposed terminology “LAN” is insufficient at addressing all of the networks that an 802 solution may be defined for anymore.

So I would argue infrastructure is a better general term – but recognize your concern.

Maybe better approach is to come up with and define a better general term.

 

John

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> On Behalf Of Glenn Parsons
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:09 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] infrastructure

 

Colleagues,

 

I would like to propose that we change an aspect of the CSD to improve the effectiveness of the review of CSDs by other WGs.

 

The background and my proposal for discussion is described here:

https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/20/ec-20-0123-00-00EC-csd-infrastructure.pdf

 

I have requested agenda time on July 7th to discuss.

 

Cheers,

Glenn.

 

 

--

Glenn Parsons

Chair, IEEE 802.1 WG

glenn.parsons@ericsson.com

+1-613-963-8141

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1