Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear All, During the IEEE 802 November 2017 Plenary meeting, we had tabled this motion to send the IEEE 802.22b response to the ISO/IEC/JTC1 due to lack of appropriate words for the response.
The EC did not like the words as were discussed and suggested in the ISO/JTC1 Standing committee.
After discussions with Andrew Myles, we have agreed to a slight change in the response to the comment made by the China NB.
Note – The 802.22b-2015 Draft has been approved to be an ISO Standard. So this response is being sent to them as a courtesy.
I am attaching the original EC motions package, and the Draft Response document with marked up text that highlights what changed.
Paul approves starting an EC e-mail ballot and Steve has re-agreed to second the motion. Motion: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Move: Apurva Mody Second: Steve Shellhammer For: Against: Abstain: Start of ballot: Tuesday 16th January 2018 Dr. Apurva N. Mody Chair, IEEE 802.22 Working Group Chairman, WhiteSpace Alliance Acting Chair, National Spectrum Consortium
|
Attachment:
IEEE_802d22_to_ISOIEC_JTC1_SC6_draft.doc
Description: IEEE_802d22_to_ISOIEC_JTC1_SC6_draft.doc
Attachment:
22-17-0091-02-0000-EC-Closing-Motions-Package.pptx
Description: 22-17-0091-02-0000-EC-Closing-Motions-Package.pptx