| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Geoff,In regards to stabilizing any of the IEEE standards adopted by ISO in JTC 1, this will require a separate agreement with ISO (as stated in the PSDO agreement).Best regards,Jodi Haasz
International Affairs Senior Manager
IEEE Standards Association
445 Hoes Lane
Piscataway, NJ 08854-4141 USA
Phone +1 732 562 6367
Mobile +1 732 439 9144
FAX +1 732 562 1571
Email: j.haasz@ieee.orghttp://standards.ieee.org/develop/intl/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
IEEE – Advancing Technology for HumanityOn Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Geoff Thompson <thompson@ieee.org> wrote:John (and Jonathan)----------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.See belowOn Dec 19, 2017, at 11:13 AMPST, John D'Ambrosia <jdambrosia@GMAIL.COM> wrote:All,Happy Holidays to everyone. I would like to leave everyone with this present – a list of action items, post Nov 2017 Plenary. Please review this list and send me your updates.Happy Holidays!John D’AmbrosiaRecording Secretary, IEEE 802 LMSCAction Item Summary (Opening Meeting)
Item 5.011 - Goldberg to resolve if declaration of affiliation is necessary for pre-PAR activities.Item 5.011 - Goldberg - Determine if IMAT is not sufficient to collect information required.Item 5.011 - Goldberg to update presentation before giving to other WGs this week, based on issues raised in EC.Item 5.011 - Goldberg to create document to educate chairs on requirements.Item 5.012 - Goldberg to ensure International Version of standards that are withdrawn are correctly noted in the IEEE SA database as such and to ensure they are withdrawn from ISO/IEC/JTC1 as appropriate.Just to make sure that this point is not lost in the shuffle.IEEE 802.2 was withdrawn as an IEEE Standard specifically because:1. IEEE does not have any such thing as no-maintenance stabilized standards and ISO/IEC does.2. ISO/IEC was willing to stabilize 8802-2 instead of withdrawing it (and did so)3. Several 802 standards had dot2 references which were repointed to 8802-2.It may well be more appropriate to stabilize the international versions of other 802 (or other IEEE) standards rather than withdraw them. ISO, IEC and JTC-1 are more flexible in this area than is the IEEE.Item 5.012 - Goldberg : Determine if the SASB rules state that there are three types of inactive standards status as reflected in the IEEE-SA FAQItem 5.12 - Stephens to review results of pseudo ballot on guidelines related to detecting dominance with Gilb to see what, if any, changes to rules are necessary.Item 6.04 - Canchi to work with Goldberg to initiate sponsor ballot to withdraw 802.20.Action Items Summary (Closing Meeting)
Item 4.04 Gilb - update P&P using new baseline (plus dominance remedy text)Gilb - update OM (ICAID and Public Statement)Item 7.021 Mody - Postpone “IEEE 802.22b Response to the China NB for the ISO/IEC/JTC1 FDIS Ballot to EC email ballot.Item 8.01 Stephens - to be the single point of contact for interacting with Newman on next gen myballot/toolsItem 8.031 Myles to withdraw 8802-1/2001, 15802-1/1996, 15802-3/1998, 802.5 based standards from ISO/IEC/JTC1I believe that 8802-5 should be stabilized rather than withdrawn.Geoff---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.