| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Roger, R5 had been uploaded. There were changes made before the meeting. That was R6 which was Jon was showing. When the review of the agenda came up there were no changes requested – hence no change – and therefore we were approving R6, Jon made comments during the call on the agenda, which is why it was noted as annotated. However, the confusion expressed in this email, is why I have asked for there not to be “annotated” versions of the agenda. Clear as mud right? John From: Roger Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org] John, I'm confused on one point. It says: Rosdahl gave overview of R6 of the agenda. It was uploaded just prior to the start of the telecconference. No discussion (Note – Annotated version of approved agenda avaialble at https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/17/ec-17-0082-07-00EC- june-6-ec-teleconference-agenda.xlsx) My recollection is there was discussion of the agenda during the call and that several amendments were made before approval. My understanding is that we were approving R7. Maybe Jon can clarify.
Roger
|